Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Dorst Jean Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Dorst Jean Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Dorst Jean Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Dorst Jean Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 10:57 to 06:13 | 42.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:50 | 07:47 to 05:57 | 16.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 07:56 to 06:42 | 11.0% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 49:46 to 48:50 | 8.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 03:18 to 02:34 | 6.5% |
| Rowing | 00:42 | 05:51 to 05:09 | 6.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:40 | 04:09 to 03:29 | 5.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:24 | 05:07 to 04:43 | 3.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 00:23 to 00:23 | 0.0% |
| Van Dorst Jean Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 05:11 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 03:50 | 04:42 +00:25 | 05:11 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:36 | 08:57 | 05:41 -00:05 | 09:53 -00:56 |
| Sled Push | 04:09 | 14:33 | 03:29 +00:40 | 15:34 -01:01 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 18:42 | 06:16 -00:15 | 19:03 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 07:47 | 24:43 | 06:04 +01:43 | 25:19 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:20 | 32:30 | 06:16 +00:04 | 31:23 +01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:56 | 38:50 | 06:52 +01:04 | 37:39 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 07:11 | 46:46 | 06:31 +00:40 | 44:31 +02:15 |
| Rowing | 05:51 | 53:57 | 05:11 +00:40 | 51:02 +02:55 |
| Running 6 | 06:40 | 59:48 | 06:20 +00:20 | 56:13 +03:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:18 | 01:06:28 | 02:36 +00:42 | 01:02:33 +03:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:09:46 | 06:19 -00:02 | 01:05:09 +04:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 10:57 | 01:16:03 | 06:22 +04:35 | 01:11:28 +04:35 |
| Running 8 | 07:53 | 01:27:00 | 07:25 +00:28 | 01:17:50 +09:10 |
| Wall Balls | 00:23 | 01:34:53 | 08:16 -07:53 | 01:25:15 +09:38 |
| Roxzone | 07:17 | 01:42:27 | 08:56 -01:39 | 01:42:27 |
Jean Paul Van Dorst delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 60% overall and within the top 50% of his age group. His total running time was 36 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running capability. However, his pacing analysis indicates a fast start during Running 1, which may have contributed to slower times in subsequent segments, particularly after demanding exercises like the Sled Pull and Sandbag Lunges. The athlete exhibits a stronger runner profile, indicating the need to focus on enhancing strength-based exercises to balance his performance.
This segment was significantly slower than average and presents the most room for improvement. To enhance performance:
This segment was notably slower, pointing to a potential area for strength improvement:
Performance in this segment can be improved by focusing on explosive strength and endurance:
Although the total running time was faster than average, there's slight room for improvement, particularly after strength exercises:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Pizarro Ivan | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:20 | |
| Petersen Jan | 2023 Hamburg | 01:42:13 | |
| Chumbley Leighton | 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:45 | |
| Kaviani James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:42:29 | |
| Sin Ka Kiu Benjamin | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:42:53 | |
| Goussé Philippe | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:49 | |
| Rice Graeme | 2023 Dublin | 01:41:58 | |
| Grant Ben | 2024 Melbourne | 01:42:19 | |
| Lagan Rian | 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:04 | |
| Harris Jason | 2022 Birmingham | 01:42:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:49:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
