Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
664 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 664 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 664 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 664 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
04:47.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 664 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Luuk Van De Beek showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 65% overall and top 66% in his age group. His total running time of 00:51:13 was particularly impressive, being 03:28 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. However, his performance in strength segments varied, suggesting room for improvement in power and endurance exercises. Luuk's pacing was well balanced, as seen from the initial running segments where he started strong without significant drop-offs in later segments. His ability to maintain a fast pace in running segments while needing improvement in strength components suggests a running-oriented profile with potential to develop a more hybrid approach.
Segments to Improve
Burpees Broad Jump: Luuk's performance in this segment was significantly slower than average, indicating a need for improving explosive power and endurance. Training Strategy: Incorporate plyometric exercises like box jumps and burpee variations to enhance power. Gradually increase the number of consecutive burpees in training to build endurance.
Wall Balls: Improvement can be achieved by focusing on upper body strength and coordination. Training Strategy: Integrate wall ball drills with progressive overload techniques, focusing on both speed and form. Practice throwing medicine balls at various heights to increase versatility.
Roxzone: Although faster than average, optimizing transition time will further enhance overall performance. Training Strategy: Practice transition drills, focusing on quick recovery and efficient movement between exercises. Include exercises like shuttle runs and agility ladders to improve transition speed.
Sled Push and Sled Pull: To improve strength and endurance, incorporate resistance training. Training Strategy: Focus on leg and core strengthening exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and sled push/pull drills with varying weights and distances.
Race Strategies
Start Strong but Controlled: Maintain the initial pace achieved in Running 1, but ensure energy conservation for later segments.
Optimize Transitions: Focus on reducing Roxzone time by practicing seamless transitions in training, emulating race conditions.
Adapt to Compromised Running: After exercises like Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls, practice running under fatigue to simulate race conditions and maintain pace.
Build Mental Resilience: Incorporate mindfulness and visualization techniques to prepare for the mental challenges of the race.