Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 694 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Dalsem Marlous's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Dalsem Marlous's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Dalsem Marlous's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Dalsem Marlous's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:02 | 54:49 to 51:47 | 51.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:21 | 07:29 to 06:08 | 22.8% |
| Rowing | 00:35 | 06:17 to 05:42 | 9.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 05:50 to 05:24 | 7.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:59 to 05:42 | 4.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 07:48 to 07:33 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:19 to 06:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Van Dalsem Marlous | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 05:41 -00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:50 | 04:45 | 05:24 +00:26 | 05:41 -00:56 |
| Running 2 | 06:46 | 10:35 | 06:14 +00:32 | 11:05 -00:30 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 17:21 | 03:10 -00:56 | 17:19 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 19:35 | 06:38 +00:14 | 20:29 -00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 06:19 | 26:27 | 06:49 -00:30 | 27:07 -00:40 |
| Running 4 | 06:58 | 32:46 | 06:39 +00:19 | 33:56 -01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:48 | 39:44 | 07:53 -00:05 | 40:35 -00:51 |
| Running 5 | 07:16 | 47:32 | 06:51 +00:25 | 48:28 -00:56 |
| Rowing | 06:17 | 54:48 | 05:46 +00:31 | 55:19 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 07:14 | 01:01:05 | 06:45 +00:29 | 01:01:05 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 01:08:19 | 02:34 -00:01 | 01:07:50 +00:29 |
| Running 7 | 07:22 | 01:10:52 | 06:44 +00:38 | 01:10:24 +00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:59 | 01:18:14 | 05:51 +00:08 | 01:17:08 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 07:38 | 01:24:13 | 07:27 +00:11 | 01:22:59 +01:14 |
| Wall Balls | 07:29 | 01:31:51 | 06:21 +01:08 | 01:30:26 +01:25 |
| Roxzone | 06:21 | 01:45:35 | 08:48 -02:27 | 01:45:35 |
Marlous Van Dalsem delivered a strong performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 813, placing her in the top 26% out of 3118 athletes. Within her age group (35-39), she ranked 136th, which is in the top 24% of 555 competitors. Her total running time was slightly slower than the average by 54 seconds, suggesting that her profile is well-balanced between running and strength components. The analysis of her initial running segments indicates she started the race with a strong pace, particularly in Running 1, where she performed significantly faster than average. This performance hints at a potential strong runner profile, with room for improvement in the strength segments and overall running stamina.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Swannell Kelly | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:07 | |
| Rieckmann Jelena | 2019 Hamburg | 01:45:05 | |
| Reilly Daria | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:34 | |
| Sandhu Gurdish | 2021 Birmingham | 01:45:17 | |
| Dobie Katy | 2023 London | 01:45:59 | |
| Trifonos Hayley | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:35 | |
| JIMENEZMARTINEZ MARIA | 2024 Stockholm | 01:45:11 | |
| Kubodera Kiyoko | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:45:59 | |
| Chahal Japneet | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:45:05 | |
| Zara Angie | 2024 New York | 01:46:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
