Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Ursem Mick's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Ursem Mick hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Ursem Mick’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ursem Mick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 06:53 to 05:40 | 25.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 05:43 to 04:33 | 24.8% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 41:04 to 40:08 | 19.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 05:28 to 04:39 | 17.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 04:38 to 04:18 | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 04:53 to 04:39 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Ursem Mick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:50 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 03:50 | 04:23 +00:15 | 04:29 -00:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 08:28 | 04:49 +00:18 | 08:52 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 13:35 | 02:47 -00:53 | 13:41 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 15:29 | 05:13 -00:03 | 16:28 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 03:31 | 20:39 | 04:42 -01:11 | 21:41 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:08 | 24:10 | 05:11 -00:03 | 26:23 -02:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 29:18 | 04:59 +00:29 | 31:34 -02:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 34:46 | 05:21 -00:01 | 36:33 -01:47 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 40:06 | 04:44 +00:09 | 41:54 -01:48 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 44:59 | 05:13 -00:14 | 46:38 -01:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 49:58 | 02:07 -00:21 | 51:51 -01:53 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 51:44 | 05:12 +00:03 | 53:58 -02:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 56:59 | 04:51 +00:52 | 59:10 -02:11 |
| Running 8 | 06:18 | 01:02:42 | 05:42 +00:36 | 01:04:01 -01:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:53 | 01:09:00 | 06:10 +00:43 | 01:09:43 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:29 | 01:22:14 | 06:21 +00:08 | 01:22:14 |
Mick Ursem delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank of 860, placing him in the top 27% of all participants, and 103rd in his age group, within the top 26%. Mick's total running time was 00:41:04, which is 26 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. His best running lap was 00:04:59, showcasing his potential as a runner. However, Mick's initial pace during Running 1 was significantly faster than average, suggesting a possible tendency to start too fast, potentially leading to fatigue in later segments. His performance is more skewed towards running, given his consistent faster-than-average run times, while strength-based exercises like the Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls showed room for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Guernion Valentin | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:02 | |
| Gall Quentin | 2023 Paris | 01:22:24 | |
| Turansky Jordan | 2023 London | 01:22:43 | |
| Haller Frank | 2023 Hannover | 01:22:28 | |
| Morley James | 2024 Manchester | 01:22:42 | |
| Wenz Florian | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:22:10 | |
| Korbutt Martin | 2018 Wien | 01:22:36 | |
| Lowe Robert | 2024 Singapore | 01:22:39 | |
| Garate Guillermo | 2023 Barcelona | 01:21:49 | |
| Artusllobera Jorge | 2024 Bilbao | 01:21:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
