Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Trout Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Trout Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Trout Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Trout Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:30 | 07:04 to 05:34 | 38.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:49 | 02:54 to 02:05 | 21.1% |
| Rowing | 00:35 | 05:49 to 05:14 | 15.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 | 02:51 to 02:29 | 9.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 05:27 to 05:13 | 6.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 04:32 to 04:18 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:07 to 04:59 | 3.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:52 to 43:52 | 0.0% |
| Trout Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:07 | 04:55 | 05:05 +00:02 | 05:03 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 10:02 | 05:25 -00:17 | 10:08 -00:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 15:10 | 02:40 +00:11 | 15:33 -00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:22 | 18:01 | 05:41 -00:19 | 18:13 -00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 05:27 | 23:23 | 05:36 -00:09 | 23:54 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 28:50 | 05:43 -00:18 | 29:30 -00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:04 | 34:15 | 05:58 +01:06 | 35:13 -00:58 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 41:19 | 05:52 -00:10 | 41:11 +00:08 |
| Rowing | 05:49 | 47:01 | 05:19 +00:30 | 47:03 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:37 | 52:50 | 05:46 -00:09 | 52:22 +00:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:54 | 58:27 | 02:13 +00:41 | 58:08 +00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:30 | 01:01:21 | 05:44 -00:14 | 01:00:21 +01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:26 | 01:06:51 | 04:39 -00:13 | 01:06:05 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:17 | 01:11:17 | 06:05 +00:12 | 01:10:44 +00:33 |
| Wall Balls | 04:32 | 01:17:34 | 04:49 -00:17 | 01:16:49 +00:45 |
| Roxzone | 06:15 | 01:28:13 | 06:35 -00:20 | 01:28:13 |
In terms of her running performance, Sarah's total running time of 00:43:52 was faster than average, indicating that she has a good running profile. However, there were some individual running segments where she was slightly slower than average, such as Running 1 (00:04 slower) and Running 5 (00:09 slower). These segments could be targeted for improvement to further enhance her running performance.
In conclusion, Sarah Trout had a strong performance in the 2022 London Hyrox race, placing her in the top 14% overall and in her age group. While she performed well in most segments, there are areas for improvement, specifically in the burpees broad jump, rowing, and farmers carry segments. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as strength and power exercises, improving rowing technique and endurance, and focusing on grip strength development, Sarah can further enhance her performance in these areas. Additionally, maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race and prioritizing efficient transitions will contribute to her overall success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conway Emily | 2024 New York | 01:27:53 | |
| Whitehouse Nicola | 2023 London | 01:28:04 | |
| Dilliway Jodie | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:18 | |
| Mee Danielle | 2024 Melbourne | 01:28:16 | |
| Baker Emily | 2024 Birmingham | 01:28:30 | |
| Bowen Kylie | 2024 London | 01:27:47 | |
| Groenen Jet | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:12 | |
| Busche Susanne | 2021 Leipzig | 01:28:16 | |
| Chen Qi | 2024 Manchester | 01:28:31 | |
| Lliger Michelle | 2023 Milan | 01:28:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Barcelona | 01:25:46 | |
| 2023 London | 01:23:10 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
