Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 518 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Swinkels Max's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Swinkels Max's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Swinkels Max's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Swinkels Max's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:31 | 39:53 to 34:22 | 88.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:44 | 04:06 to 03:22 | 11.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Swinkels Max | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 03:50 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:57 | 03:33 | 04:04 -00:07 | 03:50 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 07:30 | 04:10 +00:42 | 07:54 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 12:22 | 03:16 -00:35 | 12:04 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 15:03 | 04:31 +00:32 | 15:20 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 03:49 | 20:06 | 05:18 -01:29 | 19:51 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 23:55 | 04:31 +00:31 | 25:09 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:06 | 28:57 | 03:44 +00:22 | 29:40 -00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 33:03 | 04:37 +00:33 | 33:24 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 04:09 | 38:13 | 04:21 -00:12 | 38:01 +00:12 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 42:22 | 04:32 +00:46 | 42:22 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 47:40 | 01:57 -00:21 | 46:54 +00:46 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 49:16 | 04:36 +00:40 | 48:51 +00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:57 | 54:32 | 04:20 -00:23 | 53:27 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 58:29 | 04:55 +00:49 | 57:47 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 04:32 | 01:04:13 | 05:50 -01:18 | 01:02:42 +01:31 |
| Roxzone | 04:49 | 01:13:26 | 04:54 -00:05 | 01:13:26 |
Max Swinkels delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 18% overall and top 28% within his age group. Despite a slower total running time of 39:53, which was 4 minutes behind the average, Max excelled in strength-based exercises, significantly outperforming his competitors in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls segments. His running performance indicated a potential for improvement, especially considering the slower times in the latter running segments. The initial fast pace in Running 1 suggests a pacing strategy that may have been too aggressive, leading to fatigue in subsequent runs. Max's profile is skewed towards strength but requires enhancement in his running capability to achieve a more balanced performance.
Max's running segments showed a pattern of declining performance, with Running 2 through Running 8 all slower than the average. To improve, Max should focus on building endurance and speed over longer distances. Training strategies include:
Max was slower than average in this segment, indicating a need for improved coordination and explosive power. Recommended exercises include:
While slightly faster than average, further improvement in transition efficiency could enhance overall performance. Suggested drills include:
Start with a consistent and sustainable pace rather than too fast; this will help conserve energy for later running segments.
Focus on maintaining proper form during compromised running, such as after the Sled Push or Wall Balls, to enhance efficiency.
Ensure optimal nutrition and hydration leading up to and during the race to maintain energy levels and delay fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Valant Gasper | 2022 Leipzig | 01:13:21 | |
| De Mallevoue Guillaume | 2024 Marseille | 01:13:53 | |
| Coria Alonso Iker | 2023 Bilbao | 01:13:30 | |
| Birk Steven | World Championships | 01:13:32 | |
| Barham Nick | 2024 Singapore | 01:13:08 | |
| Gilvray Eric | 2023 London | 01:12:56 | |
| Flynn Mark | 2023 Melbourne | 01:13:20 | |
| Peck Ethan | 2024 New York | 01:13:18 | |
| Haney Taylor | 2022 Chicago | 01:13:17 | |
| Clementson Edward | 2024 Glasgow | 01:13:11 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:28:11 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
