Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Snijder Bart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Snijder Bart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Snijder Bart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Snijder Bart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:16 | 42:20 to 39:04 | 57.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:09 | 06:34 to 05:25 | 20.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 04:50 to 04:22 | 8.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:09 to 01:52 | 5.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:41 to 02:26 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 04:45 to 04:35 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:20 to 04:15 | 1.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:26 to 03:26 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Snijder Bart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:36 | 04:21 -00:01 | 04:22 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 07:56 | 04:42 +00:25 | 08:43 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 13:03 | 02:43 -00:02 | 13:25 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 15:44 | 05:05 +00:16 | 16:08 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 03:26 | 21:05 | 04:32 -01:06 | 21:13 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 24:31 | 05:05 +00:09 | 25:45 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:38 | 29:45 | 04:47 -01:09 | 30:50 -01:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 33:23 | 05:13 +00:13 | 35:37 -02:14 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 38:49 | 04:40 +00:05 | 40:50 -02:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:28 | 43:34 | 05:05 +00:23 | 45:30 -01:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 49:02 | 02:02 +00:07 | 50:35 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 51:11 | 05:04 +00:29 | 52:37 -01:26 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:50 | 56:44 | 04:40 +00:10 | 57:41 -00:57 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:01:34 | 05:33 +01:05 | 01:02:21 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:08:12 | 05:54 +00:40 | 01:07:54 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:14 | 01:19:53 | 06:05 -00:51 | 01:19:53 |
Bart Snijder delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 22% overall and the top 23% in his age group. Despite this strong finish, his total running time was 1:48 slower than the average, indicating room for improvement in his running efficiency. The performance analysis suggests that Bart has a hybrid athlete profile, with notable strengths in specific strength-based exercises like the sled pull and burpees broad jump. However, he could benefit from focusing more on running and endurance training to balance his strengths.
His pacing strategy started strong with the first run being significantly faster than average, but subsequent running segments showed a decline in speed, indicating that he may have started too fast. This suggests the need for a more consistent pacing strategy throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brooks Russell | 2023 Malaga | 01:20:21 | |
| Abbott Steve | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:25 | |
| Whelan Jake | 2023 Melbourne | 01:19:46 | |
| Watts Adam | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:57 | |
| Williams Alan | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:25 | |
| Ringe Maikel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:28 | |
| Fuller Brett | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:51 | |
| Hewson Owen | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:16 | |
| McMenemy Andrew | 2021 Birmingham | 01:19:49 | |
| Olsson Jimmy | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
