Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Snell Bram's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Snell Bram's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Snell Bram's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Snell Bram's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:14 | 41:18 to 39:04 | 45.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 05:27 to 04:25 | 21.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 05:16 to 04:22 | 18.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:31 | 02:23 to 01:52 | 10.6% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:46 to 04:35 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Snell Bram | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:46 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 03:46 | 04:21 -00:12 | 04:22 -00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 07:55 | 04:42 +00:26 | 08:43 -00:48 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 13:03 | 02:43 -00:49 | 13:25 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 14:57 | 05:06 +00:18 | 16:08 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 03:54 | 20:21 | 04:32 -00:38 | 21:14 -00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:25 | 24:15 | 05:05 +00:20 | 25:46 -01:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:27 | 29:40 | 04:49 +00:38 | 30:51 -01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 35:07 | 05:13 -00:05 | 35:40 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 40:15 | 04:40 +00:06 | 40:53 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 45:01 | 05:06 +00:13 | 45:33 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 50:20 | 02:02 +00:21 | 50:39 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 52:43 | 05:05 +00:26 | 52:41 +00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:16 | 58:14 | 04:41 +00:35 | 57:46 +00:28 |
| Running 8 | 05:40 | 01:03:30 | 05:33 +00:07 | 01:02:27 +01:03 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:09:10 | 05:55 -00:38 | 01:08:00 +01:10 |
| Roxzone | 05:45 | 01:20:02 | 06:07 -00:22 | 01:20:02 |
Bram Snell delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, finishing in the top 22% overall and top 23% in his age group. His overall time was 01:20:02, demonstrating solid endurance and strength. However, his total running time of 00:41:18 was 00:43 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from improving his running dynamics. His best running lap was an impressive 00:05:08. Bram's pacing strategy showed a fast start with his initial running and sled push segments being significantly faster than average, but his later running segments slowed down, indicating potential fatigue or energy management issues. His profile leans more towards strength, as evidenced by excellent performance in strength-based exercises like the sled push and wall balls.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Ellis | 2024 Glasgow | 01:20:14 | |
| Schweinsberg Joel | 2024 Hamburg | 01:20:14 | |
| Diler Cem | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:20:24 | |
| Rodriguez Roman Alejandro | 2023 Madrid | 01:19:44 | |
| Ennis Shaun | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:51 | |
| Scollo Daniele | 2023 Milan | 01:20:14 | |
| Samonte Charlie | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:19:44 | |
| Vera Mateos Markel | 2023 Bilbao | 01:20:23 | |
| Lenton Danny | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:53 | |
| Schille Steffen | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:20:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
