Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Seaton Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Seaton Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Seaton Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Seaton Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:27 | 46:45 to 40:18 | 91.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:28 | 05:09 to 04:41 | 6.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:42 to 02:34 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:20 to 03:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Seaton Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:40 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:00 | 03:40 | 04:24 -00:24 | 04:29 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 07:01 | 07:40 | 04:51 +02:10 | 08:53 -01:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:41 | 02:50 -00:08 | 13:44 +00:57 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 17:23 | 05:14 +00:09 | 16:34 +00:49 |
| Sled Pull | 03:20 | 22:46 | 04:45 -01:25 | 21:48 +00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 26:06 | 05:12 +00:20 | 26:33 -00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:09 | 31:38 | 05:02 +00:07 | 31:45 -00:07 |
| Running 5 | 05:47 | 36:47 | 05:22 +00:25 | 36:47 +00:00 |
| Rowing | 04:23 | 42:34 | 04:45 -00:22 | 42:09 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:39 | 46:57 | 05:15 +00:24 | 46:54 +00:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 52:36 | 02:07 -00:19 | 52:09 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 07:49 | 54:24 | 05:13 +02:36 | 54:16 +00:08 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:02:13 | 04:53 -00:31 | 59:29 +02:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:58 | 01:06:35 | 05:44 +00:14 | 01:04:22 +02:13 |
| Wall Balls | 04:49 | 01:12:33 | 06:14 -01:25 | 01:10:06 +02:27 |
| Roxzone | 05:30 | 01:22:42 | 06:22 -00:52 | 01:22:42 |
Mark Seaton, competing in the 45-49 age group, showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race. His overall rank placed him in the top 56% of 1203 athletes, and he scored even higher within his age group, ranking in the top 45% of 80 athletes. With a total running time of 00:46:45, Mark has a runner profile, however, this was 05:14 slower than the average. One notable aspect was the pacing of his runs. He started the race at a faster pace than the average, as observed from his first run, but his pace slowed down as the race progressed, particularly in the second and seventh running segments. His strength performance was above average, with his fastest segments being the Ski Erg and Wall Balls.
For better performance in future races, consider following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Marciano Eric | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:08 | |
| Brière Thomas | 2024 Marseille | 01:22:36 | |
| Fusar Poli Marco | 2024 Rimini | 01:23:11 | |
| Crapisi Matteo | 2024 Milan | 01:22:43 | |
| Van Vilsteren Dillan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:08 | |
| Morales Marcos | 2021 Dallas | 01:22:33 | |
| Douwes Koen | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:23:02 | |
| Dhaenens Bram | 2022 Maastricht | 01:22:49 | |
| Kamara Vincent | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:46 | |
| Marchant Will | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
