Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Santing Jonathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Santing Jonathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Santing Jonathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Santing Jonathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:57 | 52:30 to 48:33 | 60.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 08:11 to 06:38 | 23.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 07:08 to 06:09 | 15.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:35 to 07:35 | 0.0% |
| Santing Jonathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:03 | 00:00 | 05:09 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:03 | 04:40 +00:00 | 05:09 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:34 | 08:43 | 05:40 -00:06 | 09:49 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 14:17 | 03:30 -01:07 | 15:29 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 06:20 | 16:40 | 06:15 +00:05 | 18:59 -02:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 23:00 | 06:00 -01:24 | 25:14 -02:14 |
| Running 4 | 06:35 | 27:36 | 06:14 +00:21 | 31:14 -03:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:11 | 34:11 | 06:43 +01:28 | 37:28 -03:17 |
| Running 5 | 07:05 | 42:22 | 06:29 +00:36 | 44:11 -01:49 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 49:27 | 05:11 -00:06 | 50:40 -01:13 |
| Running 6 | 07:05 | 54:32 | 06:17 +00:48 | 55:51 -01:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:01:37 | 02:34 -00:25 | 01:02:08 -00:31 |
| Running 7 | 07:27 | 01:03:46 | 06:18 +01:09 | 01:04:42 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:08 | 01:11:13 | 06:17 +00:51 | 01:11:00 +00:13 |
| Running 8 | 08:24 | 01:18:21 | 07:25 +00:59 | 01:17:17 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:26:45 | 08:13 -00:38 | 01:24:42 +02:03 |
| Roxzone | 07:30 | 01:41:42 | 08:47 -01:17 | 01:41:42 |
Jonathan Santing's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 59% overall and within his age group. His transitions in the Roxzone were efficient, showing a strong ability to maintain momentum between exercises. However, his total running time was slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance. Jonathan started the race with a strong pace, as evidenced by his fast Running 1 split, but this pace diminished in the latter running segments, suggesting he began too quickly. His strengths are evident in the strength-oriented segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he performed significantly faster than the average, indicating a hybrid profile with a bias towards strength over running.
Jonathan's total running time was 2:27 slower than average. To enhance his running performance, he should focus on building aerobic endurance and pacing strategies. Incorporating tempo runs and long-distance runs into his weekly routine will help improve his endurance and pacing. Additionally, interval training can increase his speed over shorter distances.
This segment was 1:33 slower than average. Jonathan should focus on improving his explosive power and efficiency in this movement. Plyometric exercises such as box jumps and squat jumps can enhance his explosive strength. Practicing burpees with a focus on minimizing the time spent in transition phases between movements will also be beneficial.
With a time 0:53 slower than average, improving leg strength and endurance will be crucial. Incorporating weighted lunges, Bulgarian split squats, and step-ups into his training routine can build the necessary muscle endurance. Practicing lunges with a sandbag will also help him adapt to this specific race condition.
The later running segments (Running 5 to Running 8) showed a clear decline in performance. To address this, Jonathan should engage in compromised running drills, where he runs immediately after completing a set of strength exercises to mimic race conditions. This will help improve his ability to maintain running speed even after fatigue sets in.
Jonathan should consider adopting a more conservative pacing strategy at the start of the race to avoid early fatigue. A negative split strategy, where the second half of the race is run faster than the first, could be beneficial.
Continue to focus on maintaining fast transitions in the Roxzone, as this is already a strength. Minimizing rest periods and preparing mentally and physically for the next segment can help maintain his current efficiency.
Given his strength in power segments, Jonathan should continue to build on this while ensuring that his aerobic endurance is not neglected. A balanced training regime that includes both strength and endurance components will be key to improving overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Been Nick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:41:43 | |
| Cormican John | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:41:31 | |
| Anderson James | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:41:22 | |
| Lanner Rikard | 2023 Stockholm | 01:41:37 | |
| Hohle Jeremy | 2023 Dallas | 01:41:32 | |
| Kociemba Hannes | 2021 Hamburg | 01:42:04 | |
| Held Andreas | 2022 Leipzig | 01:42:01 | |
| Cabon Richard | 2023 Melbourne | 01:41:56 | |
| Sanchez Fabian Jesus | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:41:47 | |
| Conte Paul | 2024 Melbourne | 01:41:42 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
