Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Quinn Alan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Quinn Alan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Quinn Alan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Quinn Alan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:59 | 10:35 to 07:36 | 53.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:18 | 06:56 to 05:38 | 23.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:38 | 05:17 to 04:39 | 11.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 06:27 to 05:54 | 9.8% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:13 to 05:03 | 3.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:18 to 02:18 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:17 to 44:17 | 0.0% |
| Quinn Alan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:57 | 00:00 | 05:05 +01:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:17 | 06:57 | 04:38 +00:39 | 05:05 +01:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 12:14 | 05:31 -00:19 | 09:43 +02:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:10 | 17:26 | 03:20 -00:10 | 15:14 +02:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 20:36 | 06:04 -00:36 | 18:34 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 06:56 | 26:04 | 05:48 +01:08 | 24:38 +01:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 33:00 | 06:02 -00:52 | 30:26 +02:34 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 38:10 | 06:36 -00:47 | 36:28 +01:42 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 43:59 | 06:17 -00:46 | 43:04 +00:55 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 49:30 | 05:06 +00:07 | 49:21 +00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 54:43 | 06:08 -01:04 | 54:27 +00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 59:47 | 02:30 -00:12 | 01:00:35 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 01:02:05 | 06:04 -01:03 | 01:03:05 -01:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:27 | 01:07:06 | 06:10 +00:17 | 01:09:09 -02:03 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:13:33 | 07:03 -01:06 | 01:15:19 -01:46 |
| Wall Balls | 10:35 | 01:19:30 | 07:55 +02:40 | 01:22:22 -02:52 |
| Roxzone | 08:47 | 01:38:45 | 08:28 +00:19 | 01:38:45 |
Alan Quinn displayed a commendable performance in the 2024 Madrid HYROX race, securing a position in the top 55% of the 1509 participants and ranking in the top 60% in his age group. His total running time was notably faster than the average, indicating his strength in running. However, his initial pace was slower than average in the first running segment, which he then made up for in the later stages of the race. This suggests a need to work on his pacing strategy and potentially start a bit faster.
Based on the analysis of Alan's performance, the following strategies could be beneficial:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barrett Harry | 2023 London | 01:38:55 | |
| Shrestha Kumar | 2020 Chicago | 01:38:32 | |
| Camilleri Dirk | 2024 Madrid | 01:39:06 | |
| Bunker Mitchell | 2024 Brisbane | 01:38:38 | |
| Czubak Maciej | 2024 Poznan | 01:39:13 | |
| Mcmanus Andy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:50 | |
| Cary Tom | 2023 Birmingham | 01:39:10 | |
| Poulton Mark | 2023 London | 01:39:03 | |
| Forslund Jonas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:38:48 | |
| Himaj Lulzim | 2023 Hamburg | 01:39:07 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
