Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Parting Alvaro's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Parting Alvaro's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Parting Alvaro's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Parting Alvaro's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:26 | 48:40 to 47:14 | 50.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:39 | 06:33 to 05:54 | 23.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 05:02 to 04:39 | 13.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:18 | 07:54 to 07:36 | 10.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:03 | 02:30 to 02:27 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:55 to 02:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Parting Alvaro | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 05:03 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 04:55 | 04:38 +00:24 | 05:03 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 09:57 | 05:30 -00:05 | 09:41 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:55 | 15:22 | 03:18 -00:23 | 15:11 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 06:53 | 18:17 | 06:02 +00:51 | 18:29 -00:12 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 25:10 | 05:45 -01:09 | 24:31 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:53 | 29:46 | 06:02 -00:09 | 30:16 -00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 35:39 | 06:34 -00:46 | 36:18 -00:39 |
| Running 5 | 06:16 | 41:27 | 06:16 +00:00 | 42:52 -01:25 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 47:43 | 05:07 -00:13 | 49:08 -01:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 52:37 | 06:06 +00:02 | 54:15 -01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:30 | 58:45 | 02:30 +00:00 | 01:00:21 -01:36 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:01:15 | 06:04 +00:03 | 01:02:51 -01:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:33 | 01:07:22 | 06:09 +00:24 | 01:08:55 -01:33 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:13:55 | 07:04 +00:02 | 01:15:04 -01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 07:54 | 01:21:01 | 07:52 +00:02 | 01:22:08 -01:07 |
| Roxzone | 09:38 | 01:38:26 | 08:26 +01:12 | 01:38:26 |
Alvaro Parting's performance in the HYROX 2024 Hamburg event was commendable, with a respectable overall rank in the top 79% of all competitors and top 84% within his age group (30-34). However, there are some areas where improvements can be made. Alvaro's total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that he may benefit from a stronger focus on his running training. In general, his pacing appeared to be consistent with the exception of the third running segment where he was significantly slower than average. This suggests he might be starting out too fast and losing steam as the race progresses.
In future races, Alvaro should consider pacing himself more effectively. He could potentially benefit from a more conservative start, conserving energy for the later stages of the race. A focus on transition efficiency could also prove beneficial, as his Roxzone time is longer than average. Finally, focusing more on strength training could help Alvaro improve his performance in the strength-oriented segments of the race, thereby improving his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Semeraro Paolo | 2024 Milan | 01:37:58 | |
| Amer David | 2023 Dublin | 01:38:12 | |
| Dillon James | 2024 Gdansk | 01:38:36 | |
| O'Hara Mark | 2024 London | 01:38:40 | |
| Lee Wai Chi | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:38:07 | |
| De Ruijter Tim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:58 | |
| Göthel Enrico | 2022 Leipzig | 01:38:31 | |
| Reid Callum | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:38:56 | |
| Tiyur Gurnaik | 2024 Brisbane | 01:38:04 | |
| Richards Howard | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
