Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oliver Neale's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oliver Neale's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oliver Neale's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oliver Neale's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:47 | 42:29 to 38:42 | 78.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:36 | 05:55 to 05:19 | 12.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:31 to 04:18 | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:32 to 02:24 | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:56 to 01:51 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Oliver Neale | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:31 | 00:00 | 04:20 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:10 | 04:31 | 04:20 -00:10 | 04:20 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 08:41 | 04:41 +00:18 | 08:40 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 13:40 | 02:42 -00:10 | 13:21 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:12 | 05:05 +00:18 | 16:03 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 03:44 | 21:35 | 04:30 -00:46 | 21:08 +00:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 25:19 | 05:04 +00:19 | 25:38 -00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 30:42 | 04:46 -00:30 | 30:42 +00:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 34:58 | 05:12 +00:24 | 35:28 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 40:34 | 04:40 -00:15 | 40:40 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 44:59 | 05:04 +00:22 | 45:20 -00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:56 | 50:25 | 02:01 -00:05 | 50:24 +00:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 52:21 | 05:03 +00:22 | 52:25 -00:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 57:46 | 04:38 -00:07 | 57:28 +00:18 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:02:17 | 05:32 +00:18 | 01:02:06 +00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:08:07 | 05:51 +00:04 | 01:07:38 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:19:32 | 06:03 -00:24 | 01:19:32 |
Neale's performance indicates that he has a balanced profile, with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises. However, there is room for improvement in specific segments, which we will analyze and provide training strategies for.
In conclusion, Neale Oliver had a strong performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. While he demonstrated strengths in both running and strength-based exercises, there are areas that can be improved to enhance his overall performance. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, along with focusing on pacing, transitions, and mental preparation, Neale can continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lengwiler Pascal | 2023 Köln | 01:19:59 | |
| Müller Nico | 2022 Hamburg | 01:19:57 | |
| Suttie Lee | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:54 | |
| Bergin John | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:44 | |
| Kurczok Rene | 2024 Köln | 01:19:09 | |
| De Boer Lubbert | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:19:37 | |
| De Die Christian | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:19:07 | |
| Sturge Nick | 2022 London | 01:19:57 | |
| Bellè Edoardo | 2024 Milan | 01:19:32 | |
| Wright Anthony | 2023 Glasgow | 01:19:25 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Warschau | 01:20:48 | |
| 2023 Milan | 01:23:40 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:23:03 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:15:23 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:57 | |
| 2022 London | 01:25:24 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:19:58 | |
| 2022 London | 01:29:04 | |
| 2023 London | 01:15:32 | |
| 2024 London | 01:14:40 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:29:54 | |
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:37:12 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:02 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:27:01 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:16:20 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
