Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 553 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Oliver Neale's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Oliver Neale's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Oliver Neale's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Oliver Neale's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:13 | 43:49 to 38:36 | 85.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:47 | 05:39 to 04:52 | 12.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:07 | 04:18 to 04:11 | 1.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 06:28 to 06:27 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:22 to 03:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Oliver Neale | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:56 | 00:00 | 04:13 +01:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:56 | 04:22 -00:17 | 04:13 +01:43 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 10:01 | 04:35 +00:32 | 08:35 +01:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 15:08 | 03:43 -00:21 | 13:10 +01:58 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 18:30 | 04:59 +00:30 | 16:53 +01:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:46 | 23:59 | 06:24 -01:38 | 21:52 +02:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:29 | 28:45 | 04:59 +00:30 | 28:16 +00:29 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:18 | 34:14 | 04:27 -00:09 | 33:15 +00:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 38:32 | 05:06 +00:17 | 37:42 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:16 | 43:55 | 04:33 -00:17 | 42:48 +01:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 48:11 | 05:01 +00:16 | 47:21 +00:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 53:28 | 02:17 -00:16 | 52:22 +01:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 55:29 | 05:04 +00:16 | 54:39 +00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 01:00:49 | 05:06 +00:33 | 59:43 +01:06 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:06:28 | 05:37 +00:16 | 01:04:49 +01:39 |
| Wall Balls | 06:28 | 01:12:21 | 06:50 -00:22 | 01:10:26 +01:55 |
| Roxzone | 04:25 | 01:23:03 | 05:47 -01:22 | 01:23:03 |
His overall time of 01:23:03 was solid, but there are areas for improvement. Specifically, his total running time of 00:43:49 was 03:44 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance and overall fitness. His best running lap was 00:05:07, which shows his potential for speed and endurance.
Overall, Neale's performance in the Hyrox race was commendable, but there is room for improvement. By focusing on specific areas of weakness and implementing targeted training strategies, he can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Greiß Felix | 2022 München | 01:23:17 | |
| Lindemann Lukas | 2022 Bremen | 01:23:33 | |
| Barr William | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:31 | |
| Desimone Cory | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:46 | |
| Tallent Valentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:22:55 | |
| Van Starkenburg Jack | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:40 | |
| Salzmann Lukas | 2022 Las Vegas | 01:23:02 | |
| Chikodzi Lance | 2024 Dubai | 01:22:57 | |
| O Hare Kealy | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:40 | |
| France Jason | 2022 Dallas | 01:23:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Warschau | 01:20:48 | |
| 2023 Milan | 01:23:40 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:15:23 | |
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:57 | |
| 2022 London | 01:25:24 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 01:19:58 | |
| 2022 London | 01:29:04 | |
| 2023 London | 01:15:32 | |
| 2024 London | 01:14:40 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:19:32 | |
| 2021 Hamburg | 01:29:54 | |
| 2021 Birmingham | 01:37:12 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:02 | |
| 2022 Las Vegas | 01:27:01 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:16:20 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:27:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
