Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mulder Erwin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mulder Erwin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mulder Erwin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mulder Erwin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:58 | 50:14 to 48:16 | 38.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:01 | 07:07 to 06:06 | 19.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:54 | 08:49 to 07:55 | 17.6% |
| Rowing | 00:23 | 05:30 to 05:07 | 7.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 06:10 to 05:50 | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:51 to 02:32 | 6.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:53 to 04:41 | 3.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:49 to 02:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:26 to 06:26 | 0.0% |
| Mulder Erwin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 05:08 +00:56 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 06:04 | 04:39 +00:14 | 05:08 +00:56 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 10:57 | 05:41 -00:09 | 09:47 +01:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:49 | 16:29 | 03:27 -00:38 | 15:28 +01:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 19:18 | 06:12 -00:24 | 18:55 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:10 | 25:06 | 05:53 +00:17 | 25:07 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:01 | 31:16 | 06:14 -00:13 | 31:00 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:26 | 37:17 | 06:42 -00:16 | 37:14 +00:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:38 | 43:43 | 06:28 +00:10 | 43:56 -00:13 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 50:21 | 05:09 +00:21 | 50:24 -00:03 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 55:51 | 06:16 +00:00 | 55:33 +00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:51 | 01:02:07 | 02:32 +00:19 | 01:01:49 +00:18 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:04:58 | 06:16 +00:10 | 01:04:21 +00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:07 | 01:11:24 | 06:18 +00:49 | 01:10:37 +00:47 |
| Running 8 | 07:33 | 01:18:31 | 07:22 +00:11 | 01:16:55 +01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 08:49 | 01:26:04 | 08:09 +00:40 | 01:24:17 +01:47 |
| Roxzone | 06:32 | 01:41:15 | 08:49 -02:17 | 01:41:15 |
Erwin Mulder delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 59% overall and top 50% in his age group. His overall time was 01:41:15, showing a strong commitment and ability to complete the race successfully. Notably, Erwin's performance in the Roxzone was significantly faster than average, indicating efficient transitions. However, his total running time was 00:15 slower than average, suggesting an area for improvement. His pacing strategy appeared balanced initially but showed signs of fatigue in the later running segments. Overall, Erwin demonstrates a hybrid profile, with strengths in certain strength exercises like the Sled Push, yet his running could benefit from focused training to enhance speed and endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson Terence John | 2023 Barcelona | 01:41:00 | |
| Slater Anthony | 2022 London | 01:41:30 | |
| Berger Alexander | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:41:12 | |
| Kuijpers John | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:41:27 | |
| Weber Ben | 2024 Poznan | 01:41:36 | |
| Morales Angel | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:41:10 | |
| Halfpenny Kieran | 2023 Dublin | 01:41:33 | |
| Abal Carlos | 2024 Madrid | 01:41:39 | |
| Groos Bob | 2024 Maastricht | 01:41:44 | |
| Petri Sven | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:40:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
