Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mears Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mears Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mears Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mears Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:24 | 49:42 to 46:18 | 67.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:36 | 07:42 to 06:06 | 31.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:01 | 05:44 to 05:43 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:04 to 04:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:18 to 07:18 | 0.0% |
| Mears Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:31 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:04 | 04:31 | 04:37 -00:33 | 05:00 -00:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 08:35 | 05:25 +00:05 | 09:37 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:05 | 03:15 -01:02 | 15:02 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 16:18 | 05:59 +00:28 | 18:17 -01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:37 | 22:45 | 05:39 -01:02 | 24:16 -01:31 |
| Running 4 | 06:19 | 27:22 | 05:56 +00:23 | 29:55 -02:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:42 | 33:41 | 06:21 +01:21 | 35:51 -02:10 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 41:23 | 06:10 +00:11 | 42:12 -00:49 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 47:44 | 05:03 -00:20 | 48:22 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 06:34 | 52:27 | 05:59 +00:35 | 53:25 -00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 59:01 | 02:26 -00:16 | 59:24 -00:23 |
| Running 7 | 06:32 | 01:01:11 | 05:57 +00:35 | 01:01:50 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:44 | 01:07:43 | 05:55 -00:11 | 01:07:47 -00:04 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:13:27 | 06:52 +00:38 | 01:13:42 -00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 07:18 | 01:20:57 | 07:42 -00:24 | 01:20:34 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:36:31 | 08:15 +00:08 | 01:36:31 |
Luke's total running time was 00:49:42, which was 03:48 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to work on improving his running performance. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap was 00:04:31, which was 00:16 faster than the average. This suggests that he has the potential to excel in running, but may need to focus on maintaining this pace throughout the entire race.
In conclusion, Luke Mears performed well in the Hyrox race in Manchester. To improve his performance, he should focus on improving his running performance, specifically his overall fitness, endurance, and speed. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, tempo runs, and running drills, can help him enhance his performance in the identified segments. Additionally, focusing on strength and power exercises for the Burpees Broad Jump segment can also contribute to improved performance. By implementing these strategies and techniques, Luke can continue to progress and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Guyer Adam | 2019 Miami | 01:36:38 | |
| Baena Antonio | 2023 Bilbao | 01:36:09 | |
| Ehlers Jan Thomas | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:14 | |
| Sheppard Paul | 2023 London | 01:36:14 | |
| Van Rijn Rick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:05 | |
| Peach Josh | 2024 London | 01:36:42 | |
| Warman Peter | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:48 | |
| Lee Robert | 2024 Dallas | 01:36:46 | |
| Huijbregts Rob | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:36:31 | |
| Krnjaca Tomislav | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:36:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:36:27 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:56 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
