Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 959 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcnamara Shane's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcnamara Shane's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcnamara Shane's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcnamara Shane's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 | 52:10 to 49:45 | 39.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:21 | 09:43 to 08:22 | 21.9% |
| Sled Push | 01:05 | 04:40 to 03:35 | 17.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:04 | 07:11 to 06:07 | 17.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 | 02:47 to 02:39 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:52 to 04:45 | 1.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:06 to 06:06 | 0.0% |
| Mcnamara Shane | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:20 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:20 | 04:43 +00:09 | 05:15 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 06:03 | 10:12 | 05:45 +00:18 | 09:58 +00:14 |
| Sled Push | 04:40 | 16:15 | 03:39 +01:01 | 15:43 +00:32 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 20:55 | 06:27 -00:23 | 19:22 +01:33 |
| Sled Pull | 07:11 | 26:59 | 06:17 +00:54 | 25:49 +01:10 |
| Running 4 | 07:28 | 34:10 | 06:26 +01:02 | 32:06 +02:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:03 | 41:38 | 07:04 -02:01 | 38:32 +03:06 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 46:41 | 06:42 -00:16 | 45:36 +01:05 |
| Rowing | 05:12 | 53:07 | 05:15 -00:03 | 52:18 +00:49 |
| Running 6 | 06:19 | 58:19 | 06:30 -00:11 | 57:33 +00:46 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 01:04:38 | 02:38 +00:09 | 01:04:03 +00:35 |
| Running 7 | 06:40 | 01:07:25 | 06:29 +00:11 | 01:06:41 +00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:06 | 01:14:05 | 06:37 -00:31 | 01:13:10 +00:55 |
| Running 8 | 07:53 | 01:20:11 | 07:47 +00:06 | 01:19:47 +00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 09:43 | 01:28:04 | 08:39 +01:04 | 01:27:34 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 07:53 | 01:45:34 | 09:21 -01:28 | 01:45:34 |
Based on the splits analysis, Shane's total running time of 00:52:10 was 02:30 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:20 was 00:14 slower than the average, suggesting that there is room for improvement in his running technique and speed.
In conclusion, Shane Mcnamara showed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Dublin. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, running technique, and specific areas of weakness identified in the splits analysis, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength exercises, and form corrections, can help him become a more well-rounded and competitive athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piech Michał | 2024 Katowice | 01:45:17 | |
| Spibey Eddie | 2024 Manchester | 01:45:17 | |
| Gustafsson Pierre | 2023 Stockholm | 01:45:43 | |
| Littlejohn Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:45:08 | |
| Sillah Abdul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:45:35 | |
| Reimann Kevin | 2020 Hannover | 01:45:44 | |
| Gatebled Julien | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:45:47 | |
| Lauer Dominique | 2022 Berlin | 01:45:55 | |
| Fumarola Francesco | 2023 Milan | 01:45:24 | |
| Richter Nickolas | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:45:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
