Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcguigan Stephen Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcguigan Stephen Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcguigan Stephen Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcguigan Stephen Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:00 | 06:09 to 05:09 | 20.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:50 | 03:09 to 02:19 | 16.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:49 | 04:58 to 04:09 | 16.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:45 | 04:45 to 04:00 | 15.1% |
| Rowing | 00:37 | 05:08 to 04:31 | 12.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 04:37 to 04:10 | 9.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:17 | 02:05 to 01:48 | 5.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:25 to 04:12 | 4.4% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 35:43 to 35:43 | 0.0% |
| Mcguigan Stephen Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:06 | 00:00 | 04:18 +00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:06 | 04:19 +00:06 | 04:18 +00:48 |
| Running 2 | 03:58 | 09:31 | 04:36 -00:38 | 08:37 +00:54 |
| Sled Push | 03:09 | 13:29 | 02:39 +00:30 | 13:13 +00:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:11 | 16:38 | 04:59 -00:48 | 15:52 +00:46 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 20:49 | 04:24 +00:21 | 20:51 -00:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:34 | 25:34 | 04:57 -00:23 | 25:15 +00:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:58 | 30:08 | 04:36 +00:22 | 30:12 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 04:21 | 35:06 | 05:05 -00:44 | 34:48 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 39:27 | 04:38 +00:30 | 39:53 -00:26 |
| Running 6 | 04:22 | 44:35 | 04:59 -00:37 | 44:31 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 48:57 | 01:59 +00:06 | 49:30 -00:33 |
| Running 7 | 04:31 | 51:02 | 04:58 -00:27 | 51:29 -00:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 55:33 | 04:31 +00:06 | 56:27 -00:54 |
| Running 8 | 04:44 | 01:00:10 | 05:25 -00:41 | 01:00:58 -00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 06:09 | 01:04:54 | 05:42 +00:27 | 01:06:23 -01:29 |
| Roxzone | 06:59 | 01:17:54 | 05:49 +01:10 | 01:17:54 |
Stephen Patrick Mcguigan demonstrated a strong performance in the HYROX race in Madrid 2024. His overall rank of 278, placing him in the top 18% of 1509 athletes, is commendable. In his age group, he was in the top 19% of 363 athletes, indicating strong competition. His total running time was 3:48 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile.
Stephen started the race slightly slower than the average in the first running segment, but he quickly increased his pace in the subsequent running segments. His best lap time of 3:58 in running 2 shows his capacity to maintain a high running speed. However, the slower times in the roxzone hint at potential improvements in overall fitness and transition time.
For future races, Stephen should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holderman Chase | 2022 Dallas | 01:17:34 | |
| Mcgee Maximilian | 2024 London | 01:17:25 | |
| Martínez Valero Juan Fernando | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:17:57 | |
| Dodd Jamie | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:18 | |
| Talash Hilal | 2024 Sydney | 01:18:16 | |
| Breitkreutz Frank | 2021 Leipzig | 01:17:58 | |
| Pilz Stefan | 2019 Wien | 01:17:50 | |
| Kim Suyoung | 2024 Incheon | 01:18:18 | |
| Birtwhistle Michael | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:30 | |
| Remijn Olivier | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:17:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dublin | 01:13:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
