Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Maarschalk Greg's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Maarschalk Greg's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Maarschalk Greg's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Maarschalk Greg's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:27 | 05:44 to 04:17 | 28.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:22 | 05:38 to 04:16 | 27.1% |
| Run Total | 00:58 | 39:29 to 38:31 | 19.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:23 | 04:37 to 04:14 | 7.6% |
| Rowing | 00:20 | 04:53 to 04:33 | 6.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:17 | 04:23 to 04:06 | 5.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:00 to 01:50 | 3.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 05:23 to 05:17 | 2.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:11 to 02:11 | 0.0% |
| Maarschalk Greg | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 03:34 | 04:20 +00:17 | 04:19 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 08:11 | 04:39 -00:02 | 08:39 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 02:11 | 12:48 | 02:41 -00:30 | 13:18 -00:30 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 14:59 | 05:02 -00:02 | 15:59 -01:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:23 | 19:59 | 04:28 -00:05 | 21:01 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 24:22 | 05:01 -00:03 | 25:29 -01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 29:20 | 04:43 +01:01 | 30:30 -01:10 |
| Running 5 | 05:08 | 35:04 | 05:10 -00:02 | 35:13 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 40:12 | 04:40 +00:13 | 40:23 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 45:05 | 05:03 -00:03 | 45:03 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 50:05 | 02:01 -00:01 | 50:06 -00:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 52:05 | 05:02 +00:04 | 52:07 -00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 57:11 | 04:36 +01:02 | 57:09 +00:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:02:49 | 05:30 +00:39 | 01:01:45 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 05:23 | 01:08:58 | 05:47 -00:24 | 01:07:15 +01:43 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:19:03 | 06:01 -01:10 | 01:19:03 |
Greg Maarschalk delivered a commendable performance, finishing the Hyrox race in the top 25% of his overall category and age group. His total running time was notably strong, clocking in at 00:39:29, which is 00:41 faster than the average runner's time, suggesting Greg has a runner's profile. However, his performance in some strength-focused and complex functional segments indicates room for improvement. The initial running segments indicate that Greg started relatively fast, particularly in the first lap, which might have affected his pacing in later stages.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Conaty Michael | 2024 Stockholm | 01:19:00 | |
| Stephenson Greg | 2024 Melbourne | 01:19:12 | |
| Brunton Michael | 2024 Dublin | 01:19:26 | |
| Sheshi Arian | 2024 Milan | 01:19:06 | |
| Penwright Sam | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:09 | |
| Tutty William | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:35 | |
| Carter Andrew | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:47 | |
| Murphy Tony | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:37 | |
| Enríquez Hernández Víctor | 2024 Mexico City | 01:19:29 | |
| Fearns Adam | 2023 London | 01:18:57 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Sydney | 01:32:08 | |
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:16:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
