Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Lizza Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lizza Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lizza Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lizza Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:06 | 08:48 to 05:42 | 56.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:59 | 05:40 to 04:41 | 17.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 05:34 to 04:35 | 17.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:34 to 04:19 | 4.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 04:36 to 04:24 | 3.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:13 to 39:13 | 0.0% |
| Lizza Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:29 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 03:29 | 04:24 +00:10 | 04:29 -01:00 |
| Running 2 | 04:53 | 08:03 | 04:51 +00:02 | 08:53 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 12:56 | 02:49 -00:16 | 13:44 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 15:29 | 05:14 -00:03 | 16:33 -01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 20:40 | 04:45 -00:09 | 21:47 -01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 25:16 | 05:12 +00:29 | 26:32 -01:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:40 | 30:57 | 05:02 +00:38 | 31:44 -00:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 36:37 | 05:22 -00:06 | 36:46 -00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 41:53 | 04:45 -00:14 | 42:08 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:05 | 46:24 | 05:14 -00:09 | 46:53 -00:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 51:29 | 02:07 -00:13 | 52:07 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 53:23 | 05:13 -00:09 | 54:14 -00:51 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:34 | 58:27 | 04:52 +00:42 | 59:27 -01:00 |
| Running 8 | 04:38 | 01:04:01 | 05:43 -01:05 | 01:04:19 -00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 08:48 | 01:08:39 | 06:14 +02:34 | 01:10:02 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 05:20 | 01:22:38 | 06:22 -01:02 | 01:22:38 |
Mark Lizza, competing in the HYROX category, Age Group 25-29, displayed impressive athleticism during the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. Mark ranked in the top 21% overall and the top 24% in his age group, demonstrating a strong competitive edge against a large field of athletes. His overall time was 01:22:38, with a total running time of 00:39:13, which was 02:15 faster than the average.
Mark performed significantly above average in his running segments, showcasing his capabilities as a strong runner. His fastest running lap was a blazing 00:04:38. His roxzone time was 00:05:20, which was 00:57 faster than average, suggesting a quick transition time and great overall fitness.
However, an analysis of his race reveals that he may have started out a bit too fast, as evidenced by his Running 1 time being 00:58 faster than average, which might have affected his performance in later segments. It would be beneficial for Mark to work on managing his pace and conserving energy for the more strength-demanding segments of the race.
In future races, Mark should consider starting at a more conservative pace, to conserve energy for the more challenging, strength-demanding segments later in the race. Additionally, focusing on maintaining a steady pace during the running segments could help prevent fatigue.
During strength segments, Mark should take the time to ensure proper form and efficiency in his movements. This could help improve his times in these segments and prevent potential injuries. Furthermore, working on quick and efficient transitions between segments could also shave off valuable seconds from his overall time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rother Felix | 2018 Hamburg | 01:22:22 | |
| Lopez Martin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:44 | |
| Rankin Andre | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:52 | |
| Noack Eric | 2018 Leipzig | 01:22:10 | |
| Mcnamara Gary | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:18 | |
| D'Aloia Luigi | 2024 Milan | 01:22:54 | |
| Sibley Brandon | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:22 | |
| Steinke Daniel | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:22:57 | |
| Falkowski Guillaume | 2023 Paris | 01:23:03 | |
| Gulla Daniel | 2023 Paris | 01:22:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
