Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Landaverde Erick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Landaverde Erick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Landaverde Erick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Landaverde Erick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:28 | 08:34 to 06:06 | 43.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:15 | 08:35 to 07:20 | 22.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:54 | 03:17 to 02:23 | 16.0% |
| Rowing | 00:34 | 05:34 to 05:00 | 10.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 05:03 to 04:36 | 8.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:51 to 02:51 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:08 to 44:08 | 0.0% |
| Landaverde Erick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:01 | 00:00 | 04:59 +01:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 06:01 | 04:36 +00:27 | 04:59 +01:02 |
| Running 2 | 05:01 | 11:04 | 05:24 -00:23 | 09:35 +01:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:51 | 16:05 | 03:14 -00:23 | 14:59 +01:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 18:56 | 05:55 -00:51 | 18:13 +00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 05:15 | 24:00 | 05:37 -00:22 | 24:08 -00:08 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 29:15 | 05:55 -00:49 | 29:45 -00:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:34 | 34:21 | 06:21 +02:13 | 35:40 -01:19 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 42:55 | 06:08 -00:48 | 42:01 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 05:34 | 48:15 | 05:03 +00:31 | 48:09 +00:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:36 | 53:49 | 05:57 -00:21 | 53:12 +00:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:17 | 59:25 | 02:26 +00:51 | 59:09 +00:16 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 01:02:42 | 05:56 -00:16 | 01:01:35 +01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:08:22 | 05:54 -00:27 | 01:07:31 +00:51 |
| Running 8 | 06:23 | 01:13:49 | 06:49 -00:26 | 01:13:25 +00:24 |
| Wall Balls | 08:35 | 01:20:12 | 07:42 +00:53 | 01:20:14 -00:02 |
| Roxzone | 07:31 | 01:36:10 | 08:14 -00:43 | 01:36:10 |
Erick Landaverde demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Ciudad de Mexico HYROX event, placing in the top 42% in both overall rank and within his age group. A highlight of Erick's performance is his total running time, which was 03:08 faster than the average. This indicates that Erick's strength lies in his running capabilities, showcasing a strong runner profile. However, his slower than average performance in roxzone suggests a need for improvement in transition time and overall fitness.
Erick should consider pacing himself more effectively at the beginning of the race, as he started slower than average in the Running 1 segment. Starting at a more moderate pace could help conserve energy for later segments where Erick's performance tends to drop. Additionally, focusing on maintaining a steady rhythm during strength segments could help improve efficiency and time. Lastly, practising transitions between segments during training could significantly reduce roxzone time on race day.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stokkenes Haakon | 2023 Stockholm | 01:35:53 | |
| Barnsley Ashley | 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:49 | |
| Schlup Christophe | 2024 Stockholm | 01:36:26 | |
| Mayunga Aaron | 2024 Maastricht | 01:35:58 | |
| Lemercier Valentin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:35:48 | |
| Cardona Vidal Juan | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:02 | |
| Busch Denis | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:37 | |
| Ben Martinez Benjamin | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:36:30 | |
| Wolf David | 2019 Essen | 01:35:53 | |
| Alba Antonio | 2023 Milan | 01:35:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Mexico City | 01:39:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
