Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kosterman Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kosterman Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kosterman Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kosterman Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:11 | 51:01 to 48:50 | 68.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:19 | 06:32 to 06:13 | 10.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 05:01 to 04:43 | 9.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:09 | 06:06 to 05:57 | 4.7% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:17 to 05:09 | 4.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:05 | 06:47 to 06:42 | 2.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:29 to 02:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Kosterman Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 05:11 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:01 | 04:20 | 04:41 +00:20 | 05:11 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 06:33 | 09:21 | 05:43 +00:50 | 09:52 -00:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:19 | 15:54 | 03:30 -00:11 | 15:35 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 07:16 | 19:13 | 06:17 +00:59 | 19:05 +00:08 |
| Sled Pull | 06:06 | 26:29 | 06:05 +00:01 | 25:22 +01:07 |
| Running 4 | 06:57 | 32:35 | 06:16 +00:41 | 31:27 +01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:47 | 39:32 | 06:54 -00:07 | 37:43 +01:49 |
| Running 5 | 06:26 | 46:19 | 06:32 -00:06 | 44:37 +01:42 |
| Rowing | 05:17 | 52:45 | 05:11 +00:06 | 51:09 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 58:02 | 06:22 -00:06 | 56:20 +01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 01:04:18 | 02:35 -00:06 | 01:02:42 +01:36 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:06:47 | 06:19 +00:00 | 01:05:17 +01:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:13:06 | 06:26 +00:06 | 01:11:36 +01:30 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:19:38 | 07:27 -00:29 | 01:18:02 +01:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:26:36 | 08:17 -02:23 | 01:25:29 +01:07 |
| Roxzone | 10:23 | 01:42:45 | 08:59 +01:24 | 01:42:45 |
Patrick Kosterman delivered a solid performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 60% overall and top 59% in his age group. Despite being slightly slower than average in the total running time, he showed strong performance in strength-based segments, particularly in Wall Balls where he was significantly faster than average. His initial running splits suggest a fast start, as seen in Running 1, but he slowed down in subsequent running segments, indicating possible pacing issues. This suggests a hybrid athlete profile with a slight advantage in strength over endurance running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Piepenbrink Benk | 2024 Stockholm | 01:42:53 | |
| Hey Mathias | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:43:02 | |
| Lim Kenneth | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:42:33 | |
| Barker Simon | 2022 London | 01:42:41 | |
| Osorio Jhonata | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:42:21 | |
| Sin Ka Kiu Benjamin | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:42:53 | |
| Mevlani Grid | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:42:56 | |
| Mcguire Chris | 2024 London | 01:42:48 | |
| Chow Eric | 2024 Singapore | 01:42:56 | |
| Neo Joshua | 2023 Singapore | 01:42:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
