Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hendriks Bram's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hendriks Bram's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hendriks Bram's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hendriks Bram's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:13 | 08:53 to 05:40 | 48.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:10 | 06:49 to 04:39 | 32.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:30 | 04:48 to 04:18 | 7.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:18 to 01:57 | 5.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:14 | 04:36 to 04:22 | 3.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 04:44 to 04:33 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:03 to 38:03 | 0.0% |
| Hendriks Bram | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:48 | 03:44 | 04:23 +00:25 | 04:29 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 08:32 | 04:49 -00:02 | 08:52 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 13:19 | 02:47 -00:21 | 13:41 -00:22 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 15:45 | 05:13 -00:23 | 16:28 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:36 | 20:35 | 04:41 -00:05 | 21:41 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 04:42 | 25:11 | 05:11 -00:29 | 26:22 -01:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:49 | 29:53 | 05:00 +01:49 | 31:33 -01:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 36:42 | 05:21 -00:17 | 36:33 +00:09 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 41:46 | 04:44 -00:05 | 41:54 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 04:51 | 46:25 | 05:14 -00:23 | 46:38 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 51:16 | 02:07 +00:11 | 51:52 -00:36 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 53:34 | 05:12 -00:20 | 53:59 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 58:26 | 04:51 -00:07 | 59:11 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:03:10 | 05:43 -00:25 | 01:04:02 -00:52 |
| Wall Balls | 08:53 | 01:08:28 | 06:10 +02:43 | 01:09:45 -01:17 |
| Roxzone | 05:06 | 01:22:17 | 06:22 -01:16 | 01:22:17 |
In the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, Bram Hendriks showcased a strong performance, finishing in the top 27% overall and top 30% in his age group. His total running time of 38:03 was 3:29 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Bram consistently outperformed the average in running segments, highlighting his endurance and speed. However, his performance in strength-oriented exercises like Wall Balls and Burpees Broad Jump was notably slower. His initial running segments were significantly faster than average, suggesting a strong start, but this could have contributed to later fatigue in strength exercises. Bram's overall fitness and transition times were efficient, as seen in his Roxzone performance, but there's room for improvement in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Meng Felix | 2024 Milan | 01:22:01 | |
| Verschelden Michael | 2022 New York | 01:22:41 | |
| Hägele Florian | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:22:22 | |
| Van Rooijen Roderick | 2023 Dubai | 01:22:12 | |
| Tsang Sai Kit | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:35 | |
| Aalerud Jens | 2024 Stockholm | 01:22:24 | |
| Byrne Jack | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:46 | |
| Sagala Pierre | 2024 Paris | 01:22:13 | |
| Louw Sheldon | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:22:15 | |
| Duindam Sten | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
