Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 587 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Harmon Colby's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Harmon Colby's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Harmon Colby's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Harmon Colby's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:24. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:16 | 40:31 to 37:15 | 60.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:12 | 05:07 to 03:55 | 22.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:45 | 06:48 to 06:03 | 13.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:11 | 04:18 to 04:07 | 3.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:00 to 03:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Harmon Colby | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:18 | 00:00 | 04:03 -00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:18 | 04:09 +00:09 | 04:03 -00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:55 | 07:36 | 04:27 +00:28 | 08:12 -00:36 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 12:31 | 03:35 -00:35 | 12:39 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 04:56 | 15:31 | 04:52 +00:04 | 16:14 -00:43 |
| Sled Pull | 04:11 | 20:27 | 05:53 -01:42 | 21:06 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 24:38 | 04:52 +00:29 | 26:59 -02:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 29:59 | 04:12 +00:55 | 31:51 -01:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 35:06 | 04:57 +00:23 | 36:03 -00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 40:26 | 04:28 -00:06 | 41:00 -00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:07 | 44:48 | 04:53 +00:14 | 45:28 -00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 49:55 | 02:09 -00:09 | 50:21 -00:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 51:55 | 04:57 +00:19 | 52:30 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:31 | 57:11 | 04:53 -00:22 | 57:27 -00:16 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:01:42 | 05:24 +00:56 | 01:02:20 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 06:48 | 01:08:02 | 06:26 +00:22 | 01:07:44 +00:18 |
| Roxzone | 05:01 | 01:19:44 | 05:34 -00:33 | 01:19:44 |
Colby Harmon delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top third of the overall rankings and top 35% in his age group. His overall time was 01:19:44. An analysis of his race shows that Colby has a strong hybrid profile, with notable strengths in events like Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he was significantly faster than the average. However, his total running time was slower than average by 01:50, indicating a potential area for improvement. His initial running segments, particularly Running 1, were completed at a fast pace, suggesting a tendency to start the race quickly. This was followed by a gradual slowdown in subsequent running segments, indicating possible fatigue or pacing issues.
By focusing on these targeted improvements and strategies, Colby Harmon can enhance his performance in future Hyrox events, achieving even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zlatkov Aleksandar | 2022 Leipzig | 01:19:38 | |
| Krapfl Martin | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:09 | |
| laflamme samuel | 2024 New York | 01:19:55 | |
| Mc Nulty Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:21 | |
| Urbieta Egaña Iñaki | 2023 Bilbao | 01:19:28 | |
| Wildgrube Marcel | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:19:36 | |
| JAMES ZHAO | 2024 Beijing | 01:19:28 | |
| Groschopp Alexander | 2022 Hamburg | 01:20:10 | |
| Ramirez Suárez Josue | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:53 | |
| Suzuki Ayumu | 2024 Taipei | 01:19:51 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
