Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hageman Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hageman Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hageman Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hageman Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:57 | 47:56 to 41:59 | 85.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:27 | 05:32 to 05:05 | 6.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:17 | 05:11 to 04:54 | 4.1% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:54 to 04:45 | 2.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:11 to 02:04 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:25 to 04:24 | 0.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:04 to 02:04 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Hageman Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 04:38 -00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:57 | 04:27 -00:02 | 04:38 -00:41 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 08:22 | 04:59 +00:33 | 09:05 -00:43 |
| Sled Push | 02:04 | 13:54 | 02:56 -00:52 | 14:04 -00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:01 | 15:58 | 05:25 +00:36 | 17:00 -01:02 |
| Sled Pull | 03:32 | 21:59 | 05:00 -01:28 | 22:25 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 06:18 | 25:31 | 05:25 +00:53 | 27:25 -01:54 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:32 | 31:49 | 05:21 +00:11 | 32:50 -01:01 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 37:21 | 05:35 +00:46 | 38:11 -00:50 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 43:42 | 04:50 +00:04 | 43:46 -00:04 |
| Running 6 | 06:21 | 48:36 | 05:28 +00:53 | 48:36 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:11 | 54:57 | 02:12 -00:01 | 54:04 +00:53 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 57:08 | 05:26 +01:00 | 56:16 +00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:11 | 01:03:34 | 05:08 +00:03 | 01:01:42 +01:52 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:08:45 | 06:03 +01:01 | 01:06:50 +01:55 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:15:49 | 06:34 -01:16 | 01:12:53 +02:56 |
| Roxzone | 05:26 | 01:26:24 | 06:57 -01:31 | 01:26:24 |
Tom Hageman's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 35% of his age group, which is a commendable achievement. His overall rank is 1117 out of 3118 athletes, showcasing a solid standing in a competitive field. Despite these strengths, Tom's total running time was slower than the average by 4 minutes and 28 seconds, indicating room for improvement in endurance and speed. His initial running segment was faster than average, suggesting a potentially too fast start resulting in fatigue, as seen in his slower subsequent running segments. His strength exercises, notably the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Wall Balls, were significantly faster than average, highlighting a strong strength profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ng Bryce | 2024 Taipei | 01:26:18 | |
| Zeller Malte | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:26:04 | |
| Carmichael Duncan | 2024 Cape Town | 01:26:04 | |
| Wallace Warshow Daniel | 2024 Poznan | 01:26:54 | |
| Vriend Johan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:43 | |
| Woodward Mark | 2023 London | 01:26:38 | |
| Logan Alan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:14 | |
| Fröhle Chris | 2023 Hamburg | 01:26:53 | |
| Kwakernaak Mark | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:34 | |
| Pipito Justin | 2024 Melbourne | 01:26:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
