Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grobben Huub's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grobben Huub's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grobben Huub's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grobben Huub's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:23 | 49:34 to 43:11 | 93.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 05:39 to 05:22 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:34 to 04:27 | 1.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:56 to 02:52 | 1.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:29 to 03:29 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:11 to 06:11 | 0.0% |
| Grobben Huub | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:56 | 00:00 | 04:45 +03:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 07:56 | 04:30 +00:04 | 04:45 +03:11 |
| Running 2 | 07:30 | 12:30 | 05:07 +02:23 | 09:15 +03:15 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 20:00 | 03:01 -00:05 | 14:22 +05:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 22:56 | 05:34 -00:04 | 17:23 +05:33 |
| Sled Pull | 03:29 | 28:26 | 05:10 -01:41 | 22:57 +05:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 31:55 | 05:34 -00:10 | 28:07 +03:48 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:39 | 37:19 | 05:40 -00:01 | 33:41 +03:38 |
| Running 5 | 05:33 | 42:58 | 05:45 -00:12 | 39:21 +03:37 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 48:31 | 04:53 -00:14 | 45:06 +03:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:42 | 53:10 | 05:36 +00:06 | 49:59 +03:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 58:52 | 02:16 -00:22 | 55:35 +03:17 |
| Running 7 | 05:43 | 01:00:46 | 05:34 +00:09 | 57:51 +02:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 01:06:29 | 05:24 -00:24 | 01:03:25 +03:04 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 01:11:29 | 06:15 +00:05 | 01:08:49 +02:40 |
| Wall Balls | 06:11 | 01:17:49 | 06:52 -00:41 | 01:15:04 +02:45 |
| Roxzone | 05:21 | 01:29:13 | 07:17 -01:56 | 01:29:13 |
Huub Grobben delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 40% overall and top 41% in his age group. His overall time was 01:29:13. The analysis of his pacing reveals that Huub started the race relatively slower, as indicated by his first two running segments being significantly slower than average. However, he improved his speed in subsequent running segments, showcasing his ability to recover and maintain a steady pace. His performances in strength-based exercises like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry were particularly strong, indicating a strength-oriented profile. The slower total running time of 00:49:34 suggests that Huub can benefit from improving his running performance to achieve a more balanced athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dupre Jerome | 2024 Paris | 01:28:45 | |
| Chaplinski Leonard | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:29:01 | |
| Williams Steve | 2023 London | 01:29:21 | |
| Kharchevskyi Anton | 2023 London | 01:29:20 | |
| Demptos Fabrice | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:34 | |
| Sutton Ed | 2023 Manchester | 01:28:54 | |
| Hodsman Paul | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:26 | |
| Bleimling Uwe | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:29:13 | |
| Cervantes Raymond | 2022 Chicago | 01:28:46 | |
| Hensel Marc | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:28:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
