Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 176 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Foster Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Foster Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Foster Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Foster Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:59 | 01:02:20 to 57:21 | 55.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:59 | 11:37 to 08:38 | 33.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:34 | 04:59 to 04:25 | 6.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 11:04 to 10:35 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:13 to 07:13 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:08 to 02:08 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:54 to 06:54 | 0.0% |
| Foster Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 05:51 -00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:00 | 05:50 | 05:01 -00:01 | 05:51 -00:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 10:50 | 06:44 -00:38 | 10:52 -00:02 |
| Sled Push | 04:59 | 16:56 | 04:09 +00:50 | 17:36 -00:40 |
| Running 3 | 07:36 | 21:55 | 07:53 -00:17 | 21:45 +00:10 |
| Sled Pull | 07:13 | 29:31 | 07:26 -00:13 | 29:38 -00:07 |
| Running 4 | 07:45 | 36:44 | 07:50 -00:05 | 37:04 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 11:37 | 44:29 | 09:05 +02:32 | 44:54 -00:25 |
| Running 5 | 08:56 | 56:06 | 08:39 +00:17 | 53:59 +02:07 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 01:05:02 | 05:42 -00:13 | 01:02:38 +02:24 |
| Running 6 | 08:11 | 01:10:31 | 08:01 +00:10 | 01:08:20 +02:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 01:18:42 | 03:02 -00:54 | 01:16:21 +02:21 |
| Running 7 | 08:03 | 01:20:50 | 08:07 -00:04 | 01:19:23 +01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:54 | 01:28:53 | 08:34 -01:40 | 01:27:30 +01:23 |
| Running 8 | 09:57 | 01:35:47 | 10:53 -00:56 | 01:36:04 -00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 11:04 | 01:45:44 | 11:06 -00:02 | 01:46:57 -01:13 |
| Roxzone | 13:04 | 02:09:42 | 11:39 +01:25 | 02:09:42 |
Andrew's total running time was 01:02:20, which was 02:09 slower than the average time. This suggests that he may benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:05:50, which was 00:10 slower than the average time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running performance.
In conclusion, Andrew Foster's performance in the HYROX race in London was impressive. While he showed strength in certain segments, there are areas where he can improve to further enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can work towards improving his overall fitness, running performance, and reduce transition time in the roxzone. Implementing race strategies such as efficient pacing, quick transitions, mental preparation, and proper nutrition will also contribute to his success in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Atkins Philip | 2022 London | 02:09:57 | |
| Kuiper Martijn | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:10:06 | |
| Lee Seongjin | 2024 Singapore | 02:09:27 | |
| Khee Shian Tan | 2023 Singapore | 02:09:48 | |
| Snow Shawn | 2023 Chicago | 02:10:08 | |
| Heinceslater Kris | 2023 Melbourne | 02:09:52 | |
| Sagrado Sanchez Jorge | 2023 Dublin | 02:09:40 | |
| Finch Glyn | 2024 Manchester | 02:10:07 | |
| Magee John Paul | 2023 Dublin | 02:09:23 | |
| Rojas Arthur | 2024 Houston | 02:09:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Manchester | 01:56:56 | |
| 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:54:45 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:43:54 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:57:06 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 02:05:26 | |
| 2023 London | 01:47:25 | |
| 2024 London | 02:17:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
