Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Farnworth Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Farnworth Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Farnworth Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Farnworth Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:41 | 45:35 to 43:54 | 52.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:14 | 06:46 to 05:32 | 38.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:23 to 02:12 | 5.7% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:58 to 04:52 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:03 to 05:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:38 to 06:38 | 0.0% |
| Farnworth Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:46 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:42 | 04:31 -00:02 | 04:46 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 08:11 | 05:10 +00:15 | 09:17 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 13:36 | 03:04 -00:48 | 14:27 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 15:52 | 05:39 -00:02 | 17:31 -01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 21:29 | 05:16 -00:50 | 23:10 -01:41 |
| Running 4 | 06:09 | 25:55 | 05:38 +00:31 | 28:26 -02:31 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:46 | 32:04 | 05:49 +00:57 | 34:04 -02:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:21 | 38:50 | 05:50 +00:31 | 39:53 -01:03 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 45:11 | 04:56 +00:02 | 45:43 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 06:10 | 50:09 | 05:40 +00:30 | 50:39 -00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:23 | 56:19 | 02:18 +00:05 | 56:19 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:53 | 58:42 | 05:39 +00:14 | 58:37 +00:05 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:03 | 01:04:35 | 05:30 -00:27 | 01:04:16 +00:19 |
| Running 8 | 06:22 | 01:09:38 | 06:22 +00:00 | 01:09:46 -00:08 |
| Wall Balls | 06:38 | 01:16:00 | 07:02 -00:24 | 01:16:08 -00:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 01:30:42 | 07:32 +00:39 | 01:30:42 |
Jack Farnworth showed a commendable performance in the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, finishing in the top 33% overall and top 32% within his age group. His overall time was 01:30:42, which indicates a solid foundation of fitness. A detailed look at his performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight edge in strength-based exercises, as evidenced by his faster-than-average times in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Sandbag Lunges.
However, Jack's overall running time was slower than average by 00:28, suggesting that his running endurance or speed needs improvement. His pacing analysis indicates that he started off strong, particularly in Running 1, but gradually slowed down, which is typical of starting too fast without conserving energy for the latter parts of the race. This suggests a need to refine pacing strategy to maintain consistent performance throughout the event.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gonzales Josh | 2023 Dallas | 01:30:21 | |
| Mendez Enrique | 2024 Birmingham | 01:31:10 | |
| Van Der Lugt Jeffrey | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:01 | |
| Mackaaij Wim | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:30:21 | |
| Schwingel Florian | 2022 Hamburg | 01:30:32 | |
| Chapman Sonny | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:03 | |
| Pickersgill Shane | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:15 | |
| Dalfonso Michael | 2021 New York | 01:31:12 | |
| Rosales Stefan | 2021 New York | 01:30:46 | |
| Fleming Michael | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:30:23 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
