Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Karlsruhe using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Essig Alexander's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Essig Alexander's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Essig Alexander's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Essig Alexander's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:48 | 45:59 to 43:11 | 64.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:38 | 02:47 to 02:09 | 14.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:31 | 05:38 to 05:07 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:11 to 04:49 | 8.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:27 to 02:27 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Essig Alexander | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:00 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 05:00 | 04:30 -00:03 | 04:46 +00:14 |
| Running 2 | 05:11 | 09:27 | 05:07 +00:04 | 09:16 +00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 14:38 | 03:02 -00:35 | 14:23 +00:15 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 17:05 | 05:34 -00:02 | 17:25 -00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 22:37 | 05:12 -00:52 | 22:59 -00:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 26:57 | 05:34 +00:05 | 28:11 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:06 | 32:36 | 05:42 -01:36 | 33:45 -01:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:00 | 36:42 | 05:44 +00:16 | 39:27 -02:45 |
| Rowing | 05:11 | 42:42 | 04:53 +00:18 | 45:11 -02:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 47:53 | 05:34 +00:12 | 50:04 -02:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 53:39 | 02:16 +00:31 | 55:38 -01:59 |
| Running 7 | 05:51 | 56:26 | 05:34 +00:17 | 57:54 -01:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:02:17 | 05:25 +00:13 | 01:03:28 -01:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:07:55 | 06:15 +00:49 | 01:08:53 -00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 06:02 | 01:14:59 | 06:53 -00:51 | 01:15:08 -00:09 |
| Roxzone | 08:26 | 01:29:19 | 07:18 +01:08 | 01:29:19 |
- It is important to note that Essig's total running time of 00:45:59 was 03:32 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:05:00 suggests that he has the potential to excel in running if he trains more in this area.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Alexander Essig can improve his overall performance in future Hyrox races. It is important for him to focus on his running performance, improve transition efficiency, and develop a strategic approach to pacing and race planning.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Delohery Patrick | 2024 Sydney | 01:29:19 | |
| Arinas Salazar Juan Carlos | 2022 Valencia | 01:29:47 | |
| Price Rob | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:24 | |
| WoodwardSmith Max | 2024 Milan | 01:29:17 | |
| Donschen Philipp | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:29:44 | |
| Keursten Koen | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:29:02 | |
| Gomes Lucas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:28:50 | |
| Gomez Miranda Javier | 2023 Madrid | 01:29:37 | |
| Essig Alexander | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:29:19 | |
| Jacobsen Elliott | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:29:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
