Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Elmi Feisal's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Elmi Feisal's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Elmi Feisal's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Elmi Feisal's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 11:01 | 56:41 to 45:40 | 100.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:33 to 02:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:06 to 04:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:19 to 02:19 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:55 to 03:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Elmi Feisal | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:01 | 00:00 | 04:58 -01:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:06 | 03:01 | 04:35 -00:29 | 04:58 -01:57 |
| Running 2 | 07:51 | 07:07 | 05:23 +02:28 | 09:33 -02:26 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 14:58 | 03:11 -00:38 | 14:56 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 04:44 | 17:31 | 05:53 -01:09 | 18:07 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 22:15 | 05:30 -01:21 | 24:00 -01:45 |
| Running 4 | 08:03 | 26:24 | 05:52 +02:11 | 29:30 -03:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:06 | 34:27 | 06:10 -02:04 | 35:22 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 08:04 | 38:33 | 06:04 +02:00 | 41:32 -02:59 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 46:37 | 05:01 -00:12 | 47:36 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 08:08 | 51:26 | 05:54 +02:14 | 52:37 -01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 59:34 | 02:24 -00:05 | 58:31 +01:03 |
| Running 7 | 08:14 | 01:01:53 | 05:53 +02:21 | 01:00:55 +00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:55 | 01:10:07 | 05:48 -01:53 | 01:06:48 +03:19 |
| Running 8 | 08:39 | 01:14:02 | 06:46 +01:53 | 01:12:36 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 05:32 | 01:22:41 | 07:27 -01:55 | 01:19:22 +03:19 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:34:52 | 08:03 -01:16 | 01:34:52 |
Feisal Elmi delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam HYROX event, ranking in the top 50% overall and top 56% in his age group. Particularly noteworthy was his exceptional speed during the initial running and strength segments, indicating a solid base in both endurance and strength. However, the overall running time was slower than average, suggesting an opportunity for improvement in his running capacity. Feisal's early segments, specifically Running 1, indicate a tendency to start too quickly, potentially leading to fatigue in later segments. His profile leans more towards strength with significant time gains in strength-based exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Gareth | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:16 | |
| Moxley Daniel | 2024 London | 01:34:54 | |
| Miles Tom | 2023 Birmingham | 01:34:39 | |
| De Lascurain Carlos | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:34:51 | |
| Krätschmann Timm | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:22 | |
| Jones Stuart | 2022 Birmingham | 01:34:36 | |
| Fleming William | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:42 | |
| Fitzgerald Carter | 2023 Dallas | 01:35:06 | |
| Warber Michael | 2023 Dallas | 01:34:26 | |
| Scherer Rob | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
