Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Elings Marko's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Elings Marko's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Elings Marko's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Elings Marko's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 48:36 to 46:45 | 39.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 07:51 to 06:13 | 34.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:12 | 07:00 to 05:48 | 25.5% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 05:03 to 05:02 | 0.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:26 to 04:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:12 to 02:12 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Elings Marko | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:11 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 04:11 | 04:38 -00:12 | 05:01 -00:50 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 08:37 | 05:27 +00:11 | 09:39 -01:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:03 | 14:15 | 03:19 -00:16 | 15:06 -00:51 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 17:18 | 05:58 -00:09 | 18:25 -01:07 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 23:07 | 05:42 -00:24 | 24:23 -01:16 |
| Running 4 | 05:54 | 28:25 | 05:59 -00:05 | 30:05 -01:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:51 | 34:19 | 06:26 +01:25 | 36:04 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 06:38 | 42:10 | 06:14 +00:24 | 42:30 -00:20 |
| Rowing | 05:03 | 48:48 | 05:05 -00:02 | 48:44 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 06:17 | 53:51 | 06:02 +00:15 | 53:49 +00:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:12 | 01:00:08 | 02:27 -00:15 | 59:51 +00:17 |
| Running 7 | 06:25 | 01:02:20 | 06:02 +00:23 | 01:02:18 +00:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:00 | 01:08:45 | 06:01 +00:59 | 01:08:20 +00:25 |
| Running 8 | 07:45 | 01:15:45 | 06:59 +00:46 | 01:14:21 +01:24 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:23:30 | 07:51 -01:24 | 01:21:20 +02:10 |
| Roxzone | 07:38 | 01:37:29 | 08:18 -00:40 | 01:37:29 |
Marko Elings delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, ranking in the top 54% overall and top 44% within his age group. His total running time was 31 seconds slower than the average, indicating an opportunity for improvement in running. The initial running segments suggest a strong start, with Running 1 significantly faster than average, but a gradual slowdown is observed in subsequent runs. This indicates a potential pacing issue, where Marko might have started too fast. Marko's running profile is slightly weaker compared to his strength-based activities, with segments like the Wall Balls outperforming the average significantly. Thus, Marko has a hybrid profile but needs more focus on improving running endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oneill Ronan | 2023 Dublin | 01:37:21 | |
| Duarte Florian | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:37:21 | |
| Reyes Javier | 2024 Houston | 01:37:45 | |
| Hindmarsh Stephen | 2023 Glasgow | 01:37:04 | |
| Thomas Jack | 2022 London | 01:37:40 | |
| Banyols Andréa | 2024 Marseille | 01:37:32 | |
| Clarke Chris | 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:02 | |
| Brusaferri Claudio | 2024 Milan | 01:37:52 | |
| Lamont Alan | 2022 Birmingham | 01:37:17 | |
| Williams Max | 2023 Birmingham | 01:37:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:48:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
