Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Egan Michael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Egan Michael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Egan Michael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Egan Michael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:47. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:53 | 07:56 to 06:03 | 49.8% |
| Run Total | 00:49 | 48:48 to 47:59 | 21.6% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:33 to 05:06 | 11.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 06:13 to 05:47 | 11.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:11 | 08:01 to 07:50 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:42 to 04:41 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:05 to 06:05 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:25 to 02:25 | 0.0% |
| Egan Michael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 05:08 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 05:19 | 04:40 +00:02 | 05:08 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 10:01 | 05:36 -00:24 | 09:48 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 15:13 | 03:25 -00:44 | 15:24 -00:11 |
| Running 3 | 05:29 | 17:54 | 06:08 -00:39 | 18:49 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 06:13 | 23:23 | 05:54 +00:19 | 24:57 -01:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:51 | 29:36 | 06:05 -00:14 | 30:51 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:05 | 35:27 | 06:36 -00:31 | 36:56 -01:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:30 | 41:32 | 06:22 +00:08 | 43:32 -02:00 |
| Rowing | 05:33 | 48:02 | 05:09 +00:24 | 49:54 -01:52 |
| Running 6 | 06:41 | 53:35 | 06:12 +00:29 | 55:03 -01:28 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:25 | 01:00:16 | 02:33 -00:08 | 01:01:15 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 06:38 | 01:02:41 | 06:09 +00:29 | 01:03:48 -01:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:56 | 01:09:19 | 06:14 +01:42 | 01:09:57 -00:38 |
| Running 8 | 07:12 | 01:17:15 | 07:09 +00:03 | 01:16:11 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 08:01 | 01:24:27 | 08:13 -00:12 | 01:23:20 +01:07 |
| Roxzone | 07:50 | 01:40:10 | 08:37 -00:47 | 01:40:10 |
Michael Egan's performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race demonstrates a solid balance between running and strength-based activities. His overall rank places him in the top 49% of all competitors, indicating a commendable performance, especially given his age group where he ranks within the top 55%. His total running time of 48:48 is notably 21 seconds faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile. However, the initial running splits indicate a slightly cautious start, improving significantly in the middle segments before slightly declining in the latter stages, suggesting potential fatigue.
Michael excels in running, as seen in his faster-than-average running times across most segments, but could benefit from focusing on building strength endurance, particularly in segments like the Sandbag Lunges and Sled Pull.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basheer Fazil | 2024 Melbourne | 01:40:03 | |
| Sleator Alex | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:40:29 | |
| Hudson Justin | 2023 London | 01:39:51 | |
| Marschal Joachim | 2023 München | 01:39:57 | |
| Wegener Max | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:40:01 | |
| Thomas Glen | 2022 London | 01:40:20 | |
| Da Costa Marc | 2022 London | 01:40:18 | |
| Kremmling Mikkel Victor | 2024 Hamburg | 01:40:13 | |
| Jennes Sascha | 2022 Essen | 01:39:53 | |
| Carr Tim | 2021 Dallas | 01:40:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
