Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 458 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Diepstraten Kellie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Diepstraten Kellie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Diepstraten Kellie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Diepstraten Kellie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:23. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:59 | 57:14 to 54:15 | 88.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:22 | 07:35 to 07:13 | 10.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 05:33 to 05:31 | 1.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:11 to 08:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:41 to 05:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:01 to 06:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:46 to 06:46 | 0.0% |
| Diepstraten Kellie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:52 | 00:00 | 05:56 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:33 | 04:52 | 05:28 +00:05 | 05:56 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 06:48 | 10:25 | 06:28 +00:20 | 11:24 -00:59 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 17:13 | 03:18 -00:33 | 17:52 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 19:58 | 06:52 +00:00 | 21:10 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 07:35 | 26:50 | 07:10 +00:25 | 28:02 -01:12 |
| Running 4 | 07:23 | 34:25 | 06:56 +00:27 | 35:12 -00:47 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:11 | 41:48 | 08:29 -00:18 | 42:08 -00:20 |
| Running 5 | 07:44 | 49:59 | 07:17 +00:27 | 50:37 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 05:41 | 57:43 | 05:51 -00:10 | 57:54 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 07:44 | 01:03:24 | 07:04 +00:40 | 01:03:45 -00:21 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:11:08 | 02:41 -00:32 | 01:10:49 +00:19 |
| Running 7 | 07:36 | 01:13:17 | 07:03 +00:33 | 01:13:30 -00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:20:53 | 06:16 -00:15 | 01:20:33 +00:20 |
| Running 8 | 08:17 | 01:26:54 | 07:53 +00:24 | 01:26:49 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:35:11 | 07:01 -00:15 | 01:34:42 +00:29 |
| Roxzone | 09:13 | 01:51:03 | 09:20 -00:07 | 01:51:03 |
Kellie Diepstraten delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 28% overall and top 29% in her age group. Her overall time was competitive at 01:51:03. Analysis of her splits indicates that she started the race strong, particularly in early running segments, but her total running time was 52 seconds slower than average, suggesting room for improvement in endurance and pacing. Her strengths lie in resistance exercises, evidenced by her quick Sled Push and Farmers Carry times. This suggests a hybrid profile with a slight edge towards strength, yet her overall running performance needs enhancement to balance her skillset.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Franco De Sarabia Rodríguez Blanca | 2022 Madrid | 01:51:25 | |
| Franca Pamela | 2024 Milan | 01:50:36 | |
| Querrazzi Bonnie | 2019 New York | 01:51:33 | |
| Dr. Tettinger Mariann | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:50:56 | |
| Christie Emma | 2024 Glasgow | 01:51:14 | |
| Greyling Tayla | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:50:34 | |
| Malone Michelle | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:50:52 | |
| Swannell Kelly | 2024 Manchester | 01:51:10 | |
| Palmer Christine | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:50:33 | |
| Malinowska Katarzyna | 2022 London | 01:50:39 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
