Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Barcelona using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Diaz De Villafranca Izaguirre Alvaro's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Diaz De Villafranca Izaguirre Alvaro's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Diaz De Villafranca Izaguirre Alvaro's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Diaz De Villafranca Izaguirre Alvaro's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:37 | 04:24 to 02:47 | 46.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:35 | 06:49 to 06:14 | 16.6% |
| Run Total | 00:29 | 42:48 to 42:19 | 13.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:27 | 05:12 to 04:45 | 12.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:21 to 02:05 | 7.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:32 to 04:25 | 3.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Diaz De Villafranca Izaguirre Alvaro | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:03 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:03 | 04:28 +00:04 | 04:42 +00:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 09:35 | 05:02 +00:12 | 09:10 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 04:24 | 14:49 | 02:57 +01:27 | 14:12 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 19:13 | 05:28 +00:26 | 17:09 +02:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:12 | 25:07 | 05:02 +00:10 | 22:37 +02:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 30:19 | 05:28 +00:10 | 27:39 +02:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 35:57 | 05:26 -00:36 | 33:07 +02:50 |
| Running 5 | 05:42 | 40:47 | 05:39 +00:03 | 38:33 +02:14 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 46:29 | 04:51 -00:07 | 44:12 +02:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 51:13 | 05:30 -00:22 | 49:03 +02:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 56:21 | 02:13 +00:08 | 54:33 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:01 | 58:42 | 05:28 -00:27 | 56:46 +01:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:28 | 01:03:43 | 05:13 -00:45 | 01:02:14 +01:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:11 | 01:08:11 | 06:07 -00:56 | 01:07:27 +00:44 |
| Wall Balls | 06:49 | 01:13:22 | 06:39 +00:10 | 01:13:34 -00:12 |
| Roxzone | 07:11 | 01:27:14 | 07:01 +00:10 | 01:27:14 |
Based on his splits analysis, it is clear that Alvaro struggled in several areas, including Running 1, Running 3, Roxzone, and Running 2. These are the segments where he lost the most time compared to the average.
Overall, Alvaro has shown potential in the HYROX race but there are areas that need improvement. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, he can enhance his performance in the identified areas and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vastenburg Jelmer | 2022 Maastricht | 01:27:36 | |
| Butler Bruce | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:02 | |
| Burns Andrew | 2024 Glasgow | 01:27:03 | |
| Inness Matt | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:20 | |
| Talamini John | 2020 Dallas | 01:27:05 | |
| Norton James | 2022 London | 01:27:19 | |
| Stacey Adam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:27:05 | |
| Platt Ward | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:27:13 | |
| Meier Niclas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:49 | |
| Verbeck Matthew | 2023 Anaheim | 01:27:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
