Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Ruijter Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Ruijter Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Ruijter Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Ruijter Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:21 | 47:12 to 44:51 | 83.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 04:59 to 04:32 | 16.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:01 | 05:13 to 05:12 | 0.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:01 to 03:01 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:51 to 06:51 | 0.0% |
| De Ruijter Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 04:50 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:59 | 04:04 | 04:33 +00:26 | 04:50 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 09:03 | 05:19 +00:13 | 09:23 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 03:01 | 14:35 | 03:08 -00:07 | 14:42 -00:07 |
| Running 3 | 05:59 | 17:36 | 05:46 +00:13 | 17:50 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 05:13 | 23:35 | 05:25 -00:12 | 23:36 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:11 | 28:48 | 05:46 +00:25 | 29:01 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:30 | 34:59 | 05:59 -00:29 | 34:47 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:11 | 40:29 | 05:58 +00:13 | 40:46 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 46:40 | 04:58 -00:05 | 46:44 -00:04 |
| Running 6 | 06:03 | 51:33 | 05:49 +00:14 | 51:42 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 57:36 | 02:22 -00:22 | 57:31 +00:05 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 59:36 | 05:47 +00:28 | 59:53 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:59 | 01:05:51 | 05:37 -00:38 | 01:05:40 +00:11 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:10:50 | 06:35 +00:26 | 01:11:17 -00:27 |
| Wall Balls | 06:51 | 01:17:51 | 07:16 -00:25 | 01:17:52 -00:01 |
| Roxzone | 08:22 | 01:32:55 | 07:47 +00:35 | 01:32:55 |
Tim De Ruijter delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 35% of his age group. His overall time of 01:32:55 places him in the top 47% of all competitors, highlighting his solid position among his peers. While his total running time was slightly slower than the average by 00:55, it indicates a well-rounded athlete with a balanced profile between running and strength. The initial fast pace, particularly in Running 1, suggests a strong start, but the slightly slower subsequent running segments imply a potential need for better pacing to sustain energy throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Vonk Sebastiaan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:21 | |
| Montgomery Marcus | 2023 London | 01:33:18 | |
| Kamiński Kamil | 2023 Warschau | 01:32:34 | |
| Daniels Fredrik | 2024 Stockholm | 01:33:12 | |
| Lanfrey Etienne | 2023 Paris | 01:32:37 | |
| Nicolai Robert | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:32:28 | |
| Colwell Mark | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:26 | |
| Corrigan Jack | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:33:21 | |
| Novotny Matthias | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:33:25 | |
| Smith Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
