Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire De Groot Niels's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights De Groot Niels's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the De Groot Niels's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Groot Niels's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:55 | 08:18 to 06:23 | 31.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:37 | 07:34 to 05:57 | 26.9% |
| Sled Pull | 01:09 | 06:50 to 05:41 | 19.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:55 | 03:23 to 02:28 | 15.2% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 05:29 to 05:04 | 6.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:23 to 02:23 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:07 to 07:07 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 44:50 to 44:50 | 0.0% |
| De Groot Niels | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:47 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:47 | 04:38 -00:06 | 05:03 -01:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 08:19 | 05:32 -00:14 | 09:41 -01:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:23 | 13:37 | 03:21 -00:58 | 15:13 -01:36 |
| Running 3 | 05:25 | 16:00 | 06:06 -00:41 | 18:34 -02:34 |
| Sled Pull | 06:50 | 21:25 | 05:48 +01:02 | 24:40 -03:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:39 | 28:15 | 06:03 -00:24 | 30:28 -02:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:18 | 33:54 | 06:36 +01:42 | 36:31 -02:37 |
| Running 5 | 05:48 | 42:12 | 06:19 -00:31 | 43:07 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 05:29 | 48:00 | 05:06 +00:23 | 49:26 -01:26 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 53:29 | 06:07 -00:24 | 54:32 -01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 59:12 | 02:31 +00:52 | 01:00:39 -01:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 01:02:35 | 06:07 -00:10 | 01:03:10 -00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:34 | 01:08:32 | 06:11 +01:23 | 01:09:17 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 07:16 | 01:16:06 | 07:06 +00:10 | 01:15:28 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 07:07 | 01:23:22 | 07:54 -00:47 | 01:22:34 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 08:35 | 01:38:56 | 08:28 +00:07 | 01:38:56 |
Niels De Groot delivered a solid performance, ranking in the top 56% overall and within the top 45% of his age group. His total running time was notably strong, being 3:54 faster than the average, indicating a runner profile. This suggests that he can further enhance his performance by focusing on strength-based exercises. The initial laps (Running 1 to Running 4) reveal that Niels started with a strong pace, particularly excelling in Running 1 with a 10th percentile rank. However, his pace slightly slowed as the race progressed, which is common when transitioning from running to strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Donald Allan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:38:38 | |
| Broccardi Alberto | 2024 Turin | 01:38:58 | |
| Devane George | 2024 Berlin | 01:39:05 | |
| Cortese Enzo Domenico | 2024 Rimini | 01:39:13 | |
| Pichler Michael | 2024 Gdansk | 01:38:53 | |
| Moore Thomas | 2024 Birmingham | 01:38:56 | |
| Omidi Mo | 2024 Birmingham | 01:39:12 | |
| Dyko Jakub | 2024 Gdansk | 01:39:22 | |
| Wiedemann Leonardo | 2021 Berlin | 01:39:00 | |
| Oppliger Hampi | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:38:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
