Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 633 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of De Beer Emily's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where De Beer Emily hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare De Beer Emily’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve De Beer Emily's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:40 | 40:02 to 37:22 | 48.2% |
| Wall Balls | 02:01 | 05:06 to 03:05 | 36.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 04:44 to 03:59 | 13.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:38 to 04:35 | 0.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 03:27 to 03:24 | 0.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:28 to 01:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:43 to 03:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| De Beer Emily | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:39 | 00:00 | 04:25 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 03:39 | 04:47 -00:09 | 04:25 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 05:02 | 08:17 | 04:41 +00:21 | 09:12 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 01:28 | 13:19 | 02:18 -00:50 | 13:53 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 05:05 | 14:47 | 04:55 +00:10 | 16:11 -01:24 |
| Sled Pull | 03:43 | 19:52 | 04:34 -00:51 | 21:06 -01:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:02 | 23:35 | 04:56 +00:06 | 25:40 -02:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 28:37 | 04:33 +00:11 | 30:36 -01:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:13 | 33:21 | 05:01 +00:12 | 35:09 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 38:34 | 04:59 -00:21 | 40:10 -01:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:19 | 43:12 | 04:57 +00:22 | 45:09 -01:57 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 48:31 | 01:56 -00:18 | 50:06 -01:35 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 50:09 | 04:56 +00:21 | 52:02 -01:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:27 | 55:26 | 03:44 -00:17 | 56:58 -01:32 |
| Running 8 | 05:28 | 58:53 | 05:11 +00:17 | 01:00:42 -01:49 |
| Wall Balls | 05:06 | 01:04:21 | 03:45 +01:21 | 01:05:53 -01:32 |
| Roxzone | 05:25 | 01:14:45 | 05:07 +00:18 | 01:14:45 |
Emily De Beer delivered an impressive performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 57 out of 3118 athletes and ranking 6th in her age group of 16-24. This places her in the top 1% of competitors, showcasing her abilities as a top-tier athlete. The total race time was 01:14:45. Although her total running time was 00:40:02, which is 34 seconds slower than average, her initial running segment was significantly faster than average, indicating a strong start. However, her subsequent running times suggest a need for improved endurance or pacing strategy. Her strength segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, were exceptional, demonstrating a strong strength profile. Overall, Emily exhibits a hybrid profile with a slight edge in strength.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ville Clara | 2024 Manchester | 01:15:11 | |
| Morris Olivia | 2021 Birmingham | 01:14:31 | |
| Maskell Sarah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:14:41 | |
| Martinez Tais | 2019 Essen | 01:15:12 | |
| Nytell Emma | 2024 Stockholm | 01:15:04 | |
| Bades Chloe | 2023 Birmingham | 01:15:02 | |
| Johansson Ellen | 2023 Stockholm | 01:14:42 | |
| Riese Fanny | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:14:58 | |
| Stypa Sylwia | 2024 Manchester | 01:14:25 | |
| Varvel Mel | 2024 London | 01:14:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Milan | 01:17:22 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
