Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cross Katrina's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cross Katrina's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cross Katrina's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cross Katrina's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:56 | 45:54 to 42:58 | 65.9% |
| Sled Push | 01:08 | 03:30 to 02:22 | 25.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:23 | 02:24 to 02:01 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:48 to 04:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:21 to 03:21 | 0.0% |
| Cross Katrina | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:35 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:38 | 05:35 | 05:01 -00:23 | 04:59 +00:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:35 | 10:13 | 05:15 +00:20 | 10:00 +00:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:30 | 15:48 | 02:37 +00:53 | 15:15 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 19:18 | 05:31 +00:01 | 17:52 +01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:35 | 24:50 | 05:27 -00:52 | 23:23 +01:27 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 29:25 | 05:33 +00:05 | 28:50 +00:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:21 | 35:03 | 05:39 -01:18 | 34:23 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 39:24 | 05:41 +00:00 | 40:02 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 45:05 | 05:16 -00:28 | 45:43 -00:38 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 49:53 | 05:34 +00:11 | 50:59 -01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 55:38 | 02:10 +00:14 | 56:33 -00:55 |
| Running 7 | 05:42 | 58:02 | 05:34 +00:08 | 58:43 -00:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:13 | 01:03:44 | 04:28 -00:15 | 01:04:17 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:07:57 | 05:56 +00:34 | 01:08:45 -00:48 |
| Wall Balls | 03:21 | 01:14:27 | 04:33 -01:12 | 01:14:41 -00:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:54 | 01:25:34 | 06:20 +01:34 | 01:25:34 |
In terms of pacing, Katrina's overall running time of 00:45:54 was 02:22 slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that she may have spent more time resting or taking longer transitions in the roxzone. To improve this segment, Katrina should focus on improving her overall fitness and reducing her transition time.
Segment Analysis:
Based on the splits analysis, the segments where Katrina lost the most time were the Run Total, Roxzone, Best Lap, Running 1, Sled Push, Running 8, and Running 2. These segments should be the primary focus for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ecroyd Sue | 2023 London | 01:25:53 | |
| Gee Mellissa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:59 | |
| George Fiona | 2022 London | 01:25:36 | |
| Pototschnig Denise | 2023 München | 01:25:33 | |
| Lum Nicole | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:25:47 | |
| Sconce Caitlin | 2023 Houston | 01:25:42 | |
| Van Der Meijden Chantal | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:25:57 | |
| Vinduolyte Karolina | 2024 Dublin | 01:25:11 | |
| Steve Christine | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:37 | |
| Rendbaek Ann | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:18:31 | |
| 2022 London | 01:23:04 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:17:57 | |
| 2023 London | 01:23:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
