Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Callery Dan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Callery Dan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Callery Dan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Callery Dan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:50 | 08:38 to 05:48 | 66.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 | 05:49 to 04:38 | 28.0% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 04:53 to 04:40 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:37 to 39:37 | 0.0% |
| Callery Dan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:12 | 00:00 | 04:30 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 05:12 | 04:24 -00:05 | 04:30 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 04:23 | 09:31 | 04:52 -00:29 | 08:54 +00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 13:54 | 02:52 -00:37 | 13:46 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 04:57 | 16:09 | 05:16 -00:19 | 16:38 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 21:06 | 04:47 -00:38 | 21:54 -00:48 |
| Running 4 | 04:55 | 25:15 | 05:14 -00:19 | 26:41 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:36 | 30:10 | 05:03 -00:27 | 31:55 -01:45 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 34:46 | 05:24 -00:25 | 36:58 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 39:45 | 04:45 +00:08 | 42:22 -02:37 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 44:38 | 05:16 -00:20 | 47:07 -02:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 49:34 | 02:08 -00:17 | 52:23 -02:49 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 51:25 | 05:15 -00:17 | 54:31 -03:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 56:23 | 04:55 +00:54 | 59:46 -03:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:02:12 | 05:48 -00:27 | 01:04:41 -02:29 |
| Wall Balls | 08:38 | 01:07:33 | 06:16 +02:22 | 01:10:29 -02:56 |
| Roxzone | 07:11 | 01:23:13 | 06:28 +00:43 | 01:23:13 |
Dan Callery demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Perth Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 213 among 688 athletes, placing him in the top 30%. Within his age group (35-39), he ranked 42nd out of 124, showcasing his competitive edge in this category. His total running time was 39:37, which is 2:18 faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. Dan's best running lap was 4:23, showing his ability to maintain a fast pace.
However, the analysis of his pacing reveals that he started off a bit slower in Running 1 compared to the average, but he quickly picked up the pace in the subsequent runs. His running performance is strong, suggesting that his profile is more oriented towards running rather than strength. Thus, focusing on strength training could provide more balanced overall performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Dean | 2024 London | 01:23:22 | |
| Jacobsen Christian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:22:52 | |
| Kleinknecht Florian | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:23:42 | |
| Atkins Joe | 2023 London | 01:23:07 | |
| Kennedy Trenton | 2023 Anaheim | 01:23:07 | |
| Mauersich Martin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:23:40 | |
| Escot Garcia Victor | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:20 | |
| Fabry Alexander | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:23:39 | |
| Butler Thomas | 2023 London | 01:23:00 | |
| Rees Simon | 2023 Sydney | 01:23:40 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sydney | 01:26:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
