Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 945 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Burns Amanda's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Burns Amanda's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Burns Amanda's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Burns Amanda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:18 | 06:42 to 03:24 | 46.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:35 | 06:01 to 04:26 | 22.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:43 | 05:05 to 04:22 | 10.1% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 05:21 to 04:56 | 5.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 04:05 to 03:43 | 5.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 05:03 to 04:42 | 4.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:03 to 01:50 | 3.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 02:13 to 02:03 | 2.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:46 to 37:46 | 0.0% |
| Burns Amanda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:04 | 00:00 | 04:36 -01:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 03:04 | 04:52 +00:11 | 04:36 -01:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 08:07 | 04:54 -00:19 | 09:28 -01:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 12:42 | 02:27 -00:14 | 14:22 -01:40 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 14:55 | 05:10 -00:10 | 16:49 -01:54 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 19:55 | 04:56 +00:09 | 21:59 -02:04 |
| Running 4 | 04:49 | 25:00 | 05:09 -00:20 | 26:55 -01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:01 | 29:49 | 05:01 +01:00 | 32:04 -02:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 35:50 | 05:15 -00:13 | 37:05 -01:15 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 40:52 | 05:06 +00:15 | 42:20 -01:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 46:13 | 05:12 -00:09 | 47:26 -01:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 51:16 | 02:01 +00:02 | 52:38 -01:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 53:19 | 05:10 -00:14 | 54:39 -01:20 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:05 | 58:15 | 04:06 -00:01 | 59:49 -01:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:20 | 01:02:20 | 05:28 -00:08 | 01:03:55 -01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:07:40 | 04:05 +02:37 | 01:09:23 -01:43 |
| Roxzone | 04:50 | 01:19:05 | 05:37 -00:47 | 01:19:05 |
Amanda Burns put forth a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, achieving an overall rank of 115 out of 3118 athletes, placing her in the top 3% overall. Notably, she ranked 18th in her age group (40-44), which places her in the top 4% within her category. Her total time of 01:19:05 is impressive, and her total running time of 00:37:46 is particularly noteworthy, being 03:39 faster than the average. This indicates a strong running profile.
Analyzing her pacing, Amanda started the race with remarkable speed, as evidenced by her performance in the initial running segments, particularly Running 1, where she was 01:29 faster than average, ranking in the 1st percentile. This suggests that she may have started slightly too fast, which might have impacted her performance in later strength-based segments. Amanda's performance suggests a runner profile, excelling in running but needing to focus on improving strength-based exercises to achieve a more balanced performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mccarthy Aimee | 2024 London | 01:18:49 | |
| Simonis Pia | 2023 München | 01:18:57 | |
| Malcomson Carly | 2024 Birmingham | 01:19:09 | |
| Hebdon Gemma | 2023 London | 01:18:36 | |
| Collins Alex | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:59 | |
| Cockle Hannah | 2024 Poznan | 01:18:42 | |
| Reichert Käthe | 2023 Hannover | 01:19:18 | |
| Sidebottom Kelly | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:34 | |
| Eiselen Lina | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:18:49 | |
| Link Sarah | 2023 London | 01:18:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
