Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brommer Philip's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brommer Philip's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brommer Philip's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brommer Philip's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:58 | 41:16 to 38:18 | 75.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:32 to 04:14 | 7.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 05:31 to 05:14 | 7.2% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 04:44 to 04:32 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 01:59 to 01:49 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:57 to 03:57 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Brommer Philip | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:33 | 04:20 -00:09 | 04:19 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 04:54 | 07:44 | 04:38 +00:16 | 08:39 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 12:38 | 02:40 -00:20 | 13:17 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 14:58 | 05:01 +00:03 | 15:57 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 03:57 | 20:02 | 04:27 -00:30 | 20:58 -00:56 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 23:59 | 05:00 +00:06 | 25:25 -01:26 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:44 | 29:05 | 04:40 -00:56 | 30:25 -01:20 |
| Running 5 | 05:25 | 32:49 | 05:09 +00:16 | 35:05 -02:16 |
| Rowing | 04:44 | 38:14 | 04:39 +00:05 | 40:14 -02:00 |
| Running 6 | 05:17 | 42:58 | 05:02 +00:15 | 44:53 -01:55 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 48:15 | 02:01 -00:02 | 49:55 -01:40 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 50:14 | 05:01 +00:17 | 51:56 -01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:32 | 55:32 | 04:35 -00:03 | 56:57 -01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:41 | 01:00:04 | 05:27 +01:14 | 01:01:32 -01:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:06:45 | 05:46 -00:15 | 01:06:59 -00:14 |
| Roxzone | 06:31 | 01:18:40 | 05:55 +00:36 | 01:18:40 |
Philip Brommer showed an impressive performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 622, placing him in the top 19% of participants. Within his age group of 25-29 years, he ranked 137th, illustrating his competitive edge. His overall finishing time was 01:18:40. Notably, Philip's total running time was 00:41:16, which was slightly slower than average by 01:12, indicating his running might need more focus. His best running lap was 00:04:54. His initial running segment was significantly faster than average, suggesting he started strong but might have fatigued in later stages. The Roxzone time was slower than average, pointing towards potential improvement in transition efficiency. Overall, Philip has a balanced profile with slightly stronger strength elements, as evidenced by faster times in strength-focused exercises like the Burpees Broad Jump and Sled Push.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Clough Tom | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:07 | |
| Zounib Omar | 2024 Milan | 01:18:18 | |
| Goetsch Nate | 2024 Dallas | 01:18:52 | |
| Brandsen Jurre | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:14 | |
| Vadurel Warren | 2024 Paris | 01:18:51 | |
| Timmermans Daniel | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:18:33 | |
| Lenz Hannes | 2018 Leipzig | 01:18:18 | |
| Arslan Volkan | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:19:09 | |
| Cox Mark | 2024 Houston | 01:19:08 | |
| Bathurst Joe | 2023 London | 01:18:50 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
