Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brinxma Derk's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brinxma Derk's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brinxma Derk's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brinxma Derk's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:13 | 42:39 to 39:26 | 65.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:34 | 05:04 to 04:30 | 11.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 05:00 to 04:26 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:21 | 04:37 to 04:16 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:08 to 01:54 | 4.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:10 to 04:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:36 to 04:36 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:18 to 05:18 | 0.0% |
| Brinxma Derk | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:24 -00:52 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 03:32 | 04:22 +00:15 | 04:24 -00:52 |
| Running 2 | 05:05 | 08:09 | 04:45 +00:20 | 08:46 -00:37 |
| Sled Push | 02:10 | 13:14 | 02:44 -00:34 | 13:31 -00:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 15:24 | 05:08 +00:16 | 16:15 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 04:10 | 20:48 | 04:37 -00:27 | 21:23 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 24:58 | 05:06 +00:28 | 26:00 -01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:04 | 30:32 | 04:57 +00:07 | 31:06 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 35:36 | 05:15 +00:25 | 36:03 -00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:36 | 41:16 | 04:42 -00:06 | 41:18 -00:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 45:52 | 05:09 +00:35 | 46:00 -00:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:08 | 51:36 | 02:04 +00:04 | 51:09 +00:27 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 53:44 | 05:07 +00:38 | 53:13 +00:31 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:00 | 59:29 | 04:46 +00:14 | 58:20 +01:09 |
| Running 8 | 05:59 | 01:04:29 | 05:36 +00:23 | 01:03:06 +01:23 |
| Wall Balls | 05:18 | 01:10:28 | 06:01 -00:43 | 01:08:42 +01:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:20:56 | 06:13 -00:54 | 01:20:56 |
Derk Brinxma delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 25% overall and top 26% in his age group. His overall time was 01:20:56, indicating a strong showing given the competitive field. Notably, his best running lap was impressively fast, clocking in at 00:05:05, although his total running time was 01:42 slower than average. This suggests a slight need for improvement in endurance running. Derk started the race fairly quickly, with his initial running segments being faster than average, indicating a strong start. However, as the race progressed, his pace slowed, suggesting a need for better pacing strategies. Derk appears to have a more balanced profile, capable of both strength and endurance, but could benefit from enhanced running endurance and pacing strategy.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dodsworth Lewis | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:04 | |
| Bartmann Michael | 2023 Hamburg | 01:21:22 | |
| Boiteau Thomas | 2024 Taipei | 01:21:19 | |
| Mutti Matteo | 2024 Turin | 01:20:27 | |
| Tyas Greg | 2023 London | 01:20:44 | |
| Brooks Jeremy | 2021 London | 01:21:11 | |
| Heijmans Mats | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:20:32 | |
| Grant Alasdair | 2024 Glasgow | 01:21:26 | |
| Allroggen Yann | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:40 | |
| Sawyer Steve | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:52 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:39:35 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
