Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Barhorst Ginger's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Barhorst Ginger's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Barhorst Ginger's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Barhorst Ginger's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:53 | 07:03 to 05:10 | 38.8% |
| Wall Balls | 01:24 | 05:40 to 04:16 | 28.9% |
| Rowing | 00:46 | 05:59 to 05:13 | 15.8% |
| Run Total | 00:32 | 44:38 to 44:06 | 11.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 05:43 to 05:31 | 4.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:04 | 04:29 to 04:25 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:59 to 01:59 | 0.0% |
| Barhorst Ginger | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:57 | 00:00 | 05:03 -01:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:55 | 03:57 | 05:04 -00:09 | 05:03 -01:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 08:52 | 05:23 -00:06 | 10:07 -01:15 |
| Sled Push | 01:51 | 14:09 | 02:39 -00:48 | 15:30 -01:21 |
| Running 3 | 05:38 | 16:00 | 05:39 -00:01 | 18:09 -02:09 |
| Sled Pull | 07:03 | 21:38 | 05:35 +01:28 | 23:48 -02:10 |
| Running 4 | 05:58 | 28:41 | 05:42 +00:16 | 29:23 -00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 34:39 | 05:54 -00:11 | 35:05 -00:26 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 40:22 | 05:50 +00:06 | 40:59 -00:37 |
| Rowing | 05:59 | 46:18 | 05:19 +00:40 | 46:49 -00:31 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 52:17 | 05:44 +00:01 | 52:08 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 58:02 | 02:12 -00:13 | 57:52 +00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 01:00:01 | 05:42 +00:03 | 01:00:04 -00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:05:46 | 04:38 -00:09 | 01:05:46 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:10:15 | 06:05 +00:21 | 01:10:24 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 05:40 | 01:16:41 | 04:48 +00:52 | 01:16:29 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 05:42 | 01:27:53 | 06:36 -00:54 | 01:27:53 |
Ginger Barhorst delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, securing an overall rank of 347 out of 3118 athletes, placing her in the top 11%. In her age group (35-39), she ranked 56th, representing the top 10% of her category. Her total running time was 44:38, which was 1:20 faster than the average, indicating strong running capabilities. However, some of her early running splits suggest she might have started a bit too fast, especially with Running 1 being exceptionally fast at 00:03:57. This could have led to fatigue affecting her performance in later segments. Overall, Ginger exhibits a strong runner profile with room for improvement in strength-based segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noonan Sarah | 2023 London | 01:27:56 | |
| Conway Emily | 2024 New York | 01:27:53 | |
| Fassoli Nadia | 2024 Turin | 01:27:40 | |
| Krüger Arabella | 2022 Berlin | 01:27:36 | |
| Cardone Anna | 2018 Hamburg | 01:27:23 | |
| Guyette Jessi | 2020 Dallas | 01:28:12 | |
| Mcveigh Cath | 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:05 | |
| Jeyarajah Santhini | 2024 Madrid | 01:28:12 | |
| Dubson Beth | 2022 Chicago | 01:28:09 | |
| Oh Priscilla | 2022 New York | 01:27:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
