Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chircop Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chircop Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chircop Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chircop Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:01. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:57 | 52:04 to 49:07 | 49.0% |
| Sled Pull | 01:20 | 07:20 to 06:00 | 22.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:37 | 03:13 to 02:36 | 10.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:34 | 06:50 to 06:16 | 9.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 04:04 to 03:31 | 9.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:02 to 06:02 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:02 to 07:02 | 0.0% |
| Chircop Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 05:13 -00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:40 | 04:56 | 04:42 -00:02 | 05:13 -00:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 09:36 | 05:45 -00:12 | 09:55 -00:19 |
| Sled Push | 04:04 | 15:09 | 03:29 +00:35 | 15:40 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 06:30 | 19:13 | 06:19 +00:11 | 19:09 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 07:20 | 25:43 | 06:03 +01:17 | 25:28 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 06:34 | 33:03 | 06:18 +00:16 | 31:31 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:02 | 39:37 | 06:54 -00:52 | 37:49 +01:48 |
| Running 5 | 06:47 | 45:39 | 06:34 +00:13 | 44:43 +00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 52:26 | 05:12 -00:11 | 51:17 +01:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:57 | 57:27 | 06:22 +00:35 | 56:29 +00:58 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:13 | 01:04:24 | 02:35 +00:38 | 01:02:51 +01:33 |
| Running 7 | 07:01 | 01:07:37 | 06:19 +00:42 | 01:05:26 +02:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:50 | 01:14:38 | 06:27 +00:23 | 01:11:45 +02:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:50 | 01:21:28 | 07:34 +00:16 | 01:18:12 +03:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:02 | 01:29:18 | 08:23 -01:21 | 01:25:46 +03:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:06 | 01:43:17 | 09:08 -02:02 | 01:43:17 |
Paul's best running lap was impressive, finishing in 00:04:56, which was 00:08 faster than the average for his finish time. However, he struggled in the Sled Pull segment, finishing 00:57 slower than the average.
Based on the splits analysis, Paul generally performed better in the running segments, with most of his times being faster than the average. However, he struggled in the strength-based segments, such as the Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Sandbag Lunges, where he lost significant time compared to the average.
Overall, Paul Chircop had a solid performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his strength in the strength-based segments and his endurance and speed in the running segments, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Implementing the suggested training strategies and race strategies will help him achieve his goals and continue to improve as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Holkamp Marco | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:43:08 | |
| Sandford Stephen | 2023 London | 01:43:11 | |
| Tirnoveanu George | 2024 Poznan | 01:43:20 | |
| Karstens Sven | 2018 Hamburg | 01:43:30 | |
| Llewellyn Paul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:43:34 | |
| Marchese Alberto Alfonso | 2024 Milan | 01:42:57 | |
| Pauthier Claude | 2024 Marseille | 01:43:00 | |
| Collinson Neil | 2024 Manchester | 01:43:22 | |
| Tuda Marco | 2023 Köln | 01:43:29 | |
| Charalambous Nick | 2023 Birmingham | 01:43:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
