Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Haughton James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Haughton James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Haughton James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Haughton James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:46. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:40 | 52:40 to 47:00 | 98.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:05 | 05:56 to 05:51 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:39 to 04:38 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:19 to 03:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:12 to 06:12 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:07 to 02:07 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:52 to 05:52 | 0.0% |
| Haughton James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:45 | 00:00 | 05:01 -00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:39 | 04:45 | 04:38 +00:01 | 05:01 -00:16 |
| Running 2 | 06:01 | 09:24 | 05:29 +00:32 | 09:39 -00:15 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 15:25 | 03:18 -00:06 | 15:08 +00:17 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 18:37 | 06:00 +00:14 | 18:26 +00:11 |
| Sled Pull | 03:19 | 24:51 | 05:43 -02:24 | 24:26 +00:25 |
| Running 4 | 06:17 | 28:10 | 06:01 +00:16 | 30:09 -01:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:12 | 34:27 | 06:26 -00:14 | 36:10 -01:43 |
| Running 5 | 07:12 | 40:39 | 06:15 +00:57 | 42:36 -01:57 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 47:51 | 05:06 -00:04 | 48:51 -01:00 |
| Running 6 | 07:11 | 52:53 | 06:03 +01:08 | 53:57 -01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:07 | 01:00:04 | 02:28 -00:21 | 01:00:00 +00:04 |
| Running 7 | 07:06 | 01:02:11 | 06:04 +01:02 | 01:02:28 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:56 | 01:09:17 | 06:03 -00:07 | 01:08:32 +00:45 |
| Running 8 | 07:57 | 01:15:13 | 07:01 +00:56 | 01:14:35 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 05:52 | 01:23:10 | 07:50 -01:58 | 01:21:36 +01:34 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:37:45 | 08:19 +00:31 | 01:37:45 |
However, there are areas where James can focus on improving his performance. His total running time of 00:52:40 was 06:55 slower than the average, indicating that he may need to work on his running speed and efficiency. Additionally, his running splits in segments 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 were all slower than the average, suggesting that he may benefit from specific running training.
James should also pay attention to his form during the race. Maintaining proper running form, such as a tall posture, relaxed shoulders, and a slight forward lean, can help improve his efficiency and reduce the risk of injury.
Lastly, James should have a race strategy in mind for each segment. He should assess the demands of each segment and adjust his effort accordingly. For example, in segments where running is followed by a strength exercise, he should conserve some energy during the run to perform well in the subsequent strength exercise.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on specific areas of improvement, James can enhance his performance in future HYROX races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Göbber Philip | 2021 Hamburg | 01:37:18 | |
| Hill Antony | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:13 | |
| Peters Tim | 2024 Hamburg | 01:38:14 | |
| Grönqvist Per | 2024 Stockholm | 01:38:09 | |
| Margelli Roberto | 2024 Rimini | 01:37:43 | |
| James Andrew | 2023 Birmingham | 01:38:08 | |
| Stojiljkovic Nikola | 2023 London | 01:38:14 | |
| Hobbins Corey | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:11 | |
| Reyes Adam | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:37:25 | |
| Rienks Lesley | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:37:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
