Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Green Hayley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Green Hayley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Green Hayley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Green Hayley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:52. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:15 | 06:24 to 04:09 | 58.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:17 | 06:40 to 05:23 | 33.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:18 to 02:02 | 6.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 05:08 to 05:04 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:16 to 43:16 | 0.0% |
| Green Hayley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:59 | 00:00 | 04:59 +00:00 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:59 | 05:02 -00:10 | 04:59 +00:00 |
| Running 2 | 06:48 | 09:51 | 05:19 +01:29 | 10:01 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 01:58 | 16:39 | 02:36 -00:38 | 15:20 +01:19 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 18:37 | 05:35 -00:34 | 17:56 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 05:08 | 23:38 | 05:26 -00:18 | 23:31 +00:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 28:46 | 05:38 -00:28 | 28:57 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 33:56 | 05:43 +00:57 | 34:35 -00:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 40:36 | 05:45 -00:34 | 40:18 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 45:47 | 05:18 -00:16 | 46:03 -00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 50:49 | 05:39 -00:28 | 51:21 -00:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 56:00 | 02:11 +00:07 | 57:00 -01:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:10 | 58:18 | 05:37 -00:27 | 59:11 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:44 | 01:03:28 | 04:32 -00:48 | 01:04:48 -01:20 |
| Running 8 | 05:48 | 01:07:12 | 06:00 -00:12 | 01:09:20 -02:08 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:13:00 | 04:42 +01:42 | 01:15:20 -02:20 |
| Roxzone | 07:15 | 01:26:33 | 06:31 +00:44 | 01:26:33 |
Hayley Green performed excellently in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, securing a position in the top 10% of both her age group and overall competitors. Her total running time was faster than average, indicating that running is one of her primary strengths. This was further evidenced by the impressive lap times she achieved in the running segments. However, there was a slight dip in her performance in the Roxzone, where she took more time than average, indicating a possible area for improvement. Overall, based on her performance, Hayley appears to have a runner's profile, with a need to focus more on strength training.
Hayley should consider pacing herself better in the initial running segments to conserve energy for the subsequent strength-based segments. Given her strong running capabilities, she could utilize these segments to make up for any time lost in the strength-based segments. Furthermore, she could benefit from practicing transitions between different exercises to minimize time spent in the Roxzone. Lastly, incorporating more strength training into her regimen could help her perform better in strength-based segments and improve her overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kampen Judith | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:26:21 | |
| Chrisostome Laurine | 2024 Marseille | 01:26:04 | |
| Bchner Maike | 2023 München | 01:27:00 | |
| Molinari Joanna | 2024 Paris | 01:26:06 | |
| Gisler Leoni | 2024 Paris | 01:26:49 | |
| Kryger Maja | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:26:19 | |
| Wacker Katharina | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:26:46 | |
| Forsström tove | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:34 | |
| Spurr Beth | 2023 London | 01:27:00 | |
| Schulz Laura | 2018 Wien | 01:26:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:19:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
