Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pickard Charles's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pickard Charles's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pickard Charles's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pickard Charles's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:06 | 07:34 to 05:28 | 33.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:37 | 07:20 to 05:43 | 25.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:13 | 08:33 to 07:20 | 19.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:49 | 04:01 to 03:12 | 12.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:25 | 02:48 to 02:23 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:41 to 04:36 | 1.3% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:04 to 05:00 | 1.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:44 to 05:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 43:27 to 43:27 | 0.0% |
| Pickard Charles | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 05:11 | 04:37 +00:04 | 05:00 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 09:52 | 05:24 -00:21 | 09:37 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 04:01 | 14:55 | 03:14 +00:47 | 15:01 -00:06 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 18:56 | 05:56 -00:35 | 18:15 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 07:34 | 24:17 | 05:38 +01:56 | 24:11 +00:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 31:51 | 05:55 -00:29 | 29:49 +02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:44 | 37:17 | 06:21 -00:37 | 35:44 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:28 | 43:01 | 06:08 -00:40 | 42:05 +00:56 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 48:29 | 05:03 +00:01 | 48:13 +00:16 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 53:33 | 05:58 -00:36 | 53:16 +00:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 58:55 | 02:26 +00:22 | 59:14 -00:19 |
| Running 7 | 05:40 | 01:01:43 | 05:56 -00:16 | 01:01:40 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:20 | 01:07:23 | 05:55 +01:25 | 01:07:36 -00:13 |
| Running 8 | 06:01 | 01:14:43 | 06:49 -00:48 | 01:13:31 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 08:33 | 01:20:44 | 07:42 +00:51 | 01:20:20 +00:24 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:36:15 | 08:13 -01:08 | 01:36:15 |
However, there were some areas where Charles can focus on improving. He struggled in the Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, Sled Push, Running 1, Best Lap, and Farmers Carry segments, where he lost significant time compared to the average. These segments should be the primary focus for improvement.
In conclusion, Charles Pickard had a solid performance in the 2020 Chicago HYROX race. While he showed strength in several segments, there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Sled Pull, Sandbag Lunges, Wall Balls, Sled Push, Running 1, Best Lap, and Farmers Carry. By focusing on specific strength exercises, improving overall fitness, and implementing race strategies, Charles can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Benson Stephen | 2022 Manchester | 01:35:47 | |
| Olver Adam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:20 | |
| Dougal Adrian | 2024 Dublin | 01:36:30 | |
| Rice Shane | 2024 Birmingham | 01:35:56 | |
| Janosch Sven | 2020 Hannover | 01:36:29 | |
| Wittebol Matt | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:36:31 | |
| Simmons Jamarick | 2022 Dallas | 01:36:39 | |
| Fuller Ben | 2024 Manchester | 01:36:02 | |
| Kalauch Nicolai | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:44 | |
| Houtsma Richard | 2022 Essen | 01:35:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
