Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:31 (From 46:24 to 43:53) | 43.0% |
| Wall Balls | 02:06 (From 08:45 to 06:39) | 35.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:58 (From 06:13 to 05:15) | 16.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 (From 03:07 to 02:57) | 2.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 (From 02:17 to 02:12) | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 (From 04:30 to 04:29) | 0.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 04:38 to 04:38) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 05:12 to 05:12) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:39 to 04:39) | 0.0% |
| Amos David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:07 | 00:00 | 04:47 +01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 06:07 | 04:31 -00:01 | 04:47 +01:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:12 | 10:37 | 05:11 +00:01 | 09:18 +01:19 |
| Sled Push | 03:07 | 15:49 | 03:04 +00:03 | 14:29 +01:20 |
| Running 3 | 05:32 | 18:56 | 05:40 -00:08 | 17:33 +01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 24:28 | 05:17 -00:39 | 23:13 +01:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 29:06 | 05:38 +00:00 | 28:30 +00:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 34:44 | 05:50 -00:38 | 34:08 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 39:56 | 05:51 -00:06 | 39:58 -00:02 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 45:41 | 04:56 -00:17 | 45:49 -00:08 |
| Running 6 | 05:54 | 50:20 | 05:41 +00:13 | 50:45 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:17 | 56:14 | 02:18 -00:01 | 56:26 -00:12 |
| Running 7 | 05:49 | 58:31 | 05:39 +00:10 | 58:44 -00:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:13 | 01:04:20 | 05:31 +00:42 | 01:04:23 -00:03 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:10:33 | 06:23 +00:07 | 01:09:54 +00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 08:45 | 01:17:03 | 07:05 +01:40 | 01:16:17 +00:46 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:30:59 | 07:37 -02:18 | 01:30:59 |
Splits Analysis:
Looking at the splits, it is clear that David's strength lies in his sled push and sled pull segments. He was faster than average in both of these exercises, with times of 00:03:07 and 00:04:38, respectively. His running 3 segment was also faster than average, with a time of 00:05:32. Additionally, his burpees broad jump and rowing segments were slightly faster than average.
On the other hand, David struggled in several segments, resulting in time lost. His running 1 segment was 01:29 slower than average, running 6 was 00:14 slower, and sandbag lunges were 00:47 slower. The wall balls segment was particularly challenging for David, as he was 01:43 slower than average. His best lap time was 00:05:12, which indicates that he was able to maintain a solid pace during a specific portion of the race.
In the wall balls segment, David should focus on improving his technique and overall strength. Implementing exercises such as squats, lunges, and overhead presses can help build the necessary strength and stability for wall balls. Additionally, working on his accuracy and efficiency in hitting the target can also save valuable time during the race.
The sandbag lunges segment was another area where David lost significant time. To improve in this segment, he should focus on building lower body strength and endurance. Exercises such as lunges, squats, and step-ups can help improve his leg strength and stability. Implementing these exercises into his training routine will help him perform better in the sandbag lunges segment.
Additionally, David should pay close attention to his transitions between segments, as the roxzone times indicate that he spent less time resting or transitioning compared to the average athlete. By minimizing transition time and maximizing efficiency, he can gain an advantage and improve his overall performance.
In conclusion, David Amos had a solid performance in the Hyrox race in Manchester. While he showed strength in certain segments, there are areas for improvement. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, refining his technique in wall balls, and building lower body strength for sandbag lunges, David can enhance his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dade Delmar | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:31:01 | |
| Savchyn Oleksandr | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:30:54 | |
| Jones Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:54 | |
| Hua Alexandre | 2024 Marseille | 01:31:20 | |
| Pearson Kevin | 2024 Manchester | 01:31:10 | |
| Pulido David | 2024 Paris | 01:30:41 | |
| Bernabei Francesco | 2024 Milan | 01:30:40 | |
| Goncalves Rodrigo | 2024 Melbourne | 01:31:26 | |
| Timmins Rory | 2023 Dublin | 01:31:11 | |
| Fakiera Sonny | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:06 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Amos David
