Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Huff Bart's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Huff Bart's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Huff Bart's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Huff Bart's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:38 | 05:59 to 04:21 | 30.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:30 | 06:01 to 04:31 | 27.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 05:38 to 04:37 | 18.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 06:24 to 05:37 | 14.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:12 | 04:30 to 04:18 | 3.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 02:40 to 02:32 | 2.4% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:45 to 04:38 | 2.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:00 to 01:56 | 1.2% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:39 to 38:39 | 0.0% |
| Huff Bart | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:25 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 03:25 | 04:23 +00:07 | 04:29 -01:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 07:55 | 04:48 -00:15 | 08:52 -00:57 |
| Sled Push | 02:40 | 12:28 | 02:46 -00:06 | 13:40 -01:12 |
| Running 3 | 04:59 | 15:08 | 05:12 -00:13 | 16:26 -01:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:59 | 20:07 | 04:41 +01:18 | 21:38 -01:31 |
| Running 4 | 04:59 | 26:06 | 05:09 -00:10 | 26:19 -00:13 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 31:05 | 04:59 +00:39 | 31:28 -00:23 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 36:43 | 05:19 +00:05 | 36:27 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 42:07 | 04:44 +00:01 | 41:46 +00:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 46:52 | 05:12 -00:12 | 46:30 +00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 51:52 | 02:07 -00:07 | 51:42 +00:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:06 | 53:52 | 05:10 -00:04 | 53:49 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 58:58 | 04:51 +01:10 | 58:59 -00:01 |
| Running 8 | 05:16 | 01:04:59 | 05:42 -00:26 | 01:03:50 +01:09 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:10:15 | 06:09 +00:15 | 01:09:32 +00:43 |
| Roxzone | 05:29 | 01:22:00 | 06:19 -00:50 | 01:22:00 |
Bart Huff demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier Hyrox race. His overall rank and position within the 55-59 age group highlight his dedication and adeptness in the competition. Most notably, his total running time was faster than the average by 02:33, suggesting that he has a strong runner profile. Moreover, he started the race at a faster pace than the average and managed to maintain this momentum from running 1 to running 4.
Despite his overall strong performance, a few segments require focused improvement:
Going forward, Bart should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Scott William | 2024 Glasgow | 01:22:07 | |
| Wong Siu Yau | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:22:27 | |
| Byggnings Johan | 2023 Stockholm | 01:21:31 | |
| Wood Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:22:00 | |
| Zeng Irvin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:22:07 | |
| Mikayilov Ilyar | 2022 Leipzig | 01:21:41 | |
| Martin Stephen | 2023 Melbourne | 01:22:01 | |
| Kern Tino | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:30 | |
| Kondraciuk Piotr | 2024 Poznan | 01:21:31 | |
| Plater Euan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
