Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 499 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:27. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| BBJ | 04:36 (From 12:34 to 07:58) | 61.7% |
| Sled Pull | 01:23 (From 08:19 to 06:56) | 18.6% |
| Wall Balls | 01:06 (From 10:47 to 09:41) | 14.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:22 (From 04:26 to 04:04) | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:44 to 04:44) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:01 to 05:01) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:32 to 02:32) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 06:13 to 06:13) | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 (From 53:41 to 53:41) | 0.0% |
| Gröffel Henning | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:51 | 00:00 | 05:33 +00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:51 | 04:54 -00:10 | 05:33 +00:18 |
| Running 2 | 06:30 | 10:35 | 06:17 +00:13 | 10:27 +00:08 |
| Sled Push | 04:26 | 17:05 | 03:53 +00:33 | 16:44 +00:21 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 21:31 | 07:04 -00:18 | 20:37 +00:54 |
| Sled Pull | 08:19 | 28:17 | 06:58 +01:21 | 27:41 +00:36 |
| Running 4 | 06:53 | 36:36 | 07:04 -00:11 | 34:39 +01:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:34 | 43:29 | 08:13 +04:21 | 41:43 +01:46 |
| Running 5 | 06:55 | 56:03 | 07:27 -00:32 | 49:56 +06:07 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 01:02:58 | 05:31 -00:30 | 57:23 +05:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:52 | 01:07:59 | 07:09 -00:17 | 01:02:54 +05:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:32 | 01:14:51 | 02:53 -00:21 | 01:10:03 +04:48 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 01:17:23 | 07:16 -00:12 | 01:12:56 +04:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:13 | 01:24:27 | 07:43 -01:30 | 01:20:12 +04:15 |
| Running 8 | 06:53 | 01:30:40 | 09:02 -02:09 | 01:27:55 +02:45 |
| Wall Balls | 10:47 | 01:37:33 | 09:56 +00:51 | 01:36:57 +00:36 |
| Roxzone | 09:33 | 01:57:44 | 10:51 -01:18 | 01:57:44 |
Henning's best running lap was 00:05:51, which was 00:29 slower than the average for that segment. His performance in the other segments varied, with some being faster than the average and others being slower.
For the Burpees Broad Jump segment, Henning was 04:48 slower than the average. To improve this segment, he should focus on improving his explosive power and agility. Specific exercises that can help include box jumps, plyometric push-ups, and agility ladder drills. Additionally, practicing the proper form and technique for the burpee and broad jump will also contribute to better performance.
In the Sled Pull segment, Henning was 00:54 slower than the average. To improve this segment, he should work on his strength and endurance. Exercises such as deadlifts, squats, and sled pushes can help improve his overall strength and power. Additionally, practicing the proper technique and finding the most efficient pulling technique for the sled pull will also contribute to better performance.
In the Wall Balls segment, Henning was 00:44 slower than the average. To improve this segment, he should focus on improving his lower body and core strength. Exercises such as squats, lunges, and wall sits can help improve his leg strength. Additionally, practicing the proper form and technique for the wall ball exercise will also contribute to better performance.
For the Best Lap, Running 1, and Running 2 segments, Henning was slower than the average. To improve his running performance, he should focus on improving his cardiovascular endurance and speed. Incorporating interval training, tempo runs, and hill sprints into his training routine can help improve his running ability. Additionally, working on his running form and technique, such as maintaining an efficient stride and proper breathing, will also contribute to better performance.
In conclusion, Henning Gröffel performed well in the Hyrox race in Frankfurt, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving explosive power, strength, and running performance, Henning can work towards improving his overall race performance. Additionally, implementing pacing and transition strategies during the race will also contribute to better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Spanu Gabriele | 2024 Rimini | 01:57:49 | |
| Faber Tobias | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:57:25 | |
| Franke Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:57:16 | |
| Pogoretschnik Christoph | 2023 Hamburg | 01:57:58 | |
| Chiu Yik Tao Tobia | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:57:30 | |
| To Siu Tsun Charlie | 2024 Incheon | 01:58:03 | |
| Jochems Maurice | 2024 Köln | 01:57:45 | |
| Verduin Sander | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:57:39 | |
| Gilson Duane | 2024 Houston | 01:57:29 | |
| Paul Jason | 2024 Singapore | 01:57:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2019 Hannover Gröffel Henning | 02:02:14 | |
| 2020 Hannover Gröffel Henning | 01:56:45 | |
| 2022 Essen Gröffel Henning | 01:52:39 | |
| 2022 Bremen Gröffel Henning | 01:51:36 | |
| 2021 Hamburg Gröffel Henning | 02:02:44 | |
| 2021 Berlin Gröffel Henning | 02:08:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Gröffel Henning
